A217 TREATMENT ADHERENCE OF CHRONIC HEPATITIS B PATIENTS WITH HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA FROM THE CANHEPB NETWORK
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is the most common cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide. Aims The primary aim of this study is to explore the degree of treatment adherence to the American Association For The Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) HCC treatment guidelines for patients with CHB-HCC. Methods This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study of available data (2005–2020) in patients mono-infected with CHB collected from the Canadian HBV Network; a national consortium across 8 Canadian provinces. We analyzed data using descriptive statistics along with parametric and nonparametric statistical methods with a significance level of p < 0.05. Results Of the 6500 patients, 132 (2.0%) patients met inclusion criteria. The median age was 64 (IQR: 53.5- 71.5) with 101 (76%) being male. The median ALT was 40 (IQR: 26–59.5) and the median tumor number was 1(IQR: 1- 2) with a median tumor size of 2.6 cm (IQR: 1.9- 4.5). 98 (74.5%) patients were HBeAg negative with a median viral load of 3.8 logs (IQR 1.9 – 5.8). 58 (43%) patients had cirrhosis at diagnosis. 36% of patients were diagnosed with HCC on their first screening imaging whereas 39% were found to have HCC on repeated surveillance imaging. 116 (87.9%) were on treatment at the time of diagnosis or after (70 (60.3%) NA and 46 (39%) Combination therapy with double NA or NA plus interferon). Out of the 132 patients, BCLC stage 0, A, B, and C represented 30 (23%), 42 (32%), 17 (13%), and 5 (4%) patients, respectively, with 38 (28%) patients with unknown BCLC stage. The overall adherence to AASLD guidelines was 61%. The HCC treatment adherence rate for patients with BCLC stage 0, A, B were 63%, 97.5%, and 23.5%, respectively. BCLC stages C and D did not have a sufficient sample size for analysis. The adherence rate ranged from 53% (Eastern Canada) to 71% (Western Canada) across Canada. Conclusions In this retrospective nationwide cohort study of patients with CHB-related HCC, the overall treatment adherence rate to AASLD guidelines was low with notable regional differences. Further analysis will determine the cause of regional differences. Funding Agencies None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".