MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213147561 · doi:10.1364/josab.447365

Widely tunable and switchable multiwavelength erbium-doped fiber laser based on a single ring cavity

2022· article· en· W4213147561 on OpenAlexaff
Jawad Mirza, Salman Ghafoor, Ahmad Atieh, Benish Kanwal, Khurram Karim Qureshi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Optical Society of America B · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersKing Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
KeywordsMaterials scienceLaser linewidthLasing thresholdFiber laserOptoelectronicsOpticsWavelengthLaserErbiumComb filterSIGNAL (programming language)Filter (signal processing)DopingPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose and demonstrate through numerical simulations a novel, to the best of our knowledge, widely tunable and switchable multiwavelength erbium-doped fiber laser (EDFL) operating in the 1524–1650 nm wavelength range covering the C-, L-, and U-bands. The EDFL is based on a single ring cavity and a single forward pump source operating at 980 nm wavelength. The length of the erbium-doped fiber and pumping configuration is optimized, enabling a wide tuning of 126 nm with an average lasing power of 15 dBm. Switchable multiple wavelengths are generated from the EDFL through an intracavity tunable optical filter (TOF) and a specially designed out-of-cavity comb filter (CF). Forty-nine wavelengths having average optical power and linewidth of around −10 dBm and 0.01 nm, respectively, are obtained at the output of the CF. Moreover, the free spectral range among the multiple wavelengths is adjusted easily by simply varying the frequency of sinusoidal radio frequency signal used to modulate the lasing signal obtained by tuning the intracavity TOF at a particular wavelength with the help of a dual-drive Mach–Zehnder modulator. The proposed EDFL is low cost, efficient, and highly stable with an average output power of around 15 dBm for 10% output coupling ratio over a 126 nm wide tuning range covering C-, L- and U-bands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.514

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Optical Society of America BSame topicAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsFrench-language works237,207