MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4213150863 · doi:10.1002/etc.5316

Inhibition of Oocyte Maturation by Malathion and Structurally Related Chemicals in Zebrafish (<i>Danio rerio</i>) After In Vitro and In Vivo Exposure

2022· article· en· W4213150863 on OpenAlexafffund
Justin G.P. Miller, Darren Van Essen, Markus Brinkmann, Yamin Raza, Justin Dubiel, Kaden K. Fujita, Jon A. Doering, Steve Wiseman

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueGlobal Institute for Water SecurityUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Lethbridge
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsOocyteGerminal vesicleBiologyZebrafishIn vitro maturationOogenesisDanioIn vivoAndrologyCell biologyBiochemistryEmbryoGeneticsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Oogenesis is the process by which a primary oocyte develops into a fertilizable oocyte, making it critical to successful reproduction in fish. In zebrafish (Danio rerio), there are five stages of oogenesis. During the final step (oocyte maturation), the maturation-inducing hormone 17α,20β-dihydroxy-4-pregnen-3-one (MIH) activates the membrane progestin receptor, inducing germinal vesicle breakdown. Using in vitro assays, it has been shown that anthropogenic stressors can dysregulate MIH-induced oocyte maturation. However, it is unknown whether the in vitro assay is predictive of reproductive performance after in vivo exposure. We demonstrate that a known inhibitor of oocyte maturation, malathion, and a structurally related chemical, dimethoate, inhibit oocyte maturation. However, malaoxon and omethoate, which are metabolites of malathion and dimethoate, did not inhibit oocyte maturation. Malathion and dimethoate inhibited maturation to a similar magnitude when oocytes were exposed for 4 h in vitro or 10 days in vivo, suggesting that the in vitro zebrafish oocyte maturation assay might be predictive of alterations to reproductive performance. However, when adult zebrafish were exposed to malathion for 21 days, there was no alteration in fecundity or fertility in comparison with control fish. Our study supports the oocyte maturation assay as being predictive of the success of in vitro oocyte maturation after in vivo exposure, but it remains unclear whether inhibition of MIH-induced oocyte maturation in vitro correlates to decreases in reproductive performance. Environ Toxicol Chem 2022;41:1381–1389. © 2022 SETAC Abstract The ability of oocyte maturation assays to predict reproductive performance in zebrafish. Maturation inducing hormone (MIH) stimulated maturation of oocytes after in vitro exposures to selected chemicals was predictive of the success of oocytes to mature in vitro after in vivo exposure. However, oocyte maturation assays using in vitro exposures were not predictive of reproductive performance during a 21-day reproduction assay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry→Same topicReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species→French-language works237,207→