MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4213151506 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab049.065

A66 THE IMPACT OF A MULTIDISCIPLINARY ADOLESCENT AND YOUNG ADULT (AYA) INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE (IBD) ON CLINIC NO SHOW RATES

2022· article· en· W4213151506 on OpenAlexaff
Rishi Sharma, Smita Halder, Mary Zachos, C. Radoja, Christina Grant, Usha Chauhan, E Brackenridge, Robert M. Issenman, Mary Sherlock, Jenna Dowhaniuk, Nikhil Pai, Herbert Brill, Elyanne M. Ratcliffe, Neeraj Narula, John K. Marshall, K Prowse

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health SciencesMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePsychosocialAttendanceYoung adultInflammatory bowel diseaseDiseasePopulationFamily medicineHealth careGerontologyPsychiatryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Transitioning from pediatric to adult health care is associated with significant psychosocial and clinical morbidity. Adolescents not only transition their medical care, but also experience vast changes in the physical, social, and psychological spheres of their lives. The medical team must help navigate these changes to provide optimal care. IBD in adolescence is associated with increased hospitalizations and surgery. This is due to several factors, including medication non-adherence and a failure to attend medical appointments. There has been a greater focus on improving care for this unique population. McMaster Children’s Hospital has integrated the AYA IBD clinic for patients between the ages of 16 and 22. The goal is to transition patients using a developmentally appropriate framework to facilitate self-efficacy and help identify comorbid mental health conditions while building resilience. Aims To explore the impact of the implementation of a dedicated transition clinic on attendance at medical visits for AYA patients with IBD. Methods The total numbers of patients booked in the AYA IBD Clinic was compared to an age matched subset of the patients in the adult McMaster Complex IBD (CIBD) Clinic. These visits were assessed based on whether the visit was: attended, cancelled, or no showed. Visits were then stratified between in-person and virtual visits. Unpaired t tests was performed to compare the AYA IBD clinic and the CIBD clinic. Findings were deemed significant based on p-values <0.05. Results The percentages of patients that attended visits (in-person or virtually) was similar between both clinics at 86% versus 79% Year 1 (Y1) and 76% versus 81% Year 2 (Y2). The number of patients seen in the AYA clinic increased from Y1 (n=92) to Y2 (n=131). The CIBD clinic saw fewer patients between Y1 (n=202) and Y2 (n=79). There were a higher number of patients who cancelled or no showed in Y2 versus Y1 for the AYA virtual visits (13 versus 8) compared to the CIBD clinic (Y2,1 versus Y1,1). Conclusions Our results highlight the challenges of transitioning adolescent patients with IBD. Our retrospective study was not powered to show significance. Given the increase in cancellation and no-show rates in Y2, the AYA clinic has incorporated a patient navigator to issue reminder phone calls and facilitate communication with patients between clinics. Future studies will re-assess how the presence of a patient navigator impacts attendance and cancellation rates. Future studies will also assess how the AYA clinic impacts transition readiness and self-efficacy, which is being measured through validated questionnaires in our clinic. Funding Agencies Grants-In-Aid

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare→French-language works237,207→