MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4213153033 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab049.227

A228 A FERMENTABLE FIBRE FREE DIET ACCELERATES SPONTANEOUS COLITIS DEVELOPMENT AND ALTERS THE GUT MICROBIOME IN MUC2-/- MICE

2022· article· en· W4213153033 on OpenAlexaff
Genelle R. Healey, Alana Schick, Kevan Jacobson, Bruce A. Vallance

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGut microbiota and health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMucusInulinColitisFirmicutesMicrobiomeMucinMicrobiologyBiologyDysbiosisCecumGut floraBacteriaShort-chain fatty acidFecesFermentationInternal medicineGastroenterologyFood scienceMedicineImmunologyBiochemistryBioinformatics16S ribosomal RNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background A key feature of ulcerative colitis (UC) is a defective colonic mucus layer. As Muc2-/- mice lack intestinal mucus, they’re often used to model UC. In these mice, luminal bacteria translocate from the gut lumen, triggering spontaneous colitis by 12–16 weeks of age. Notably, mucus defects are also seen in wildtype mice fed a fermentable fibre free (FF-free) diet. Aside from thinner mucus, FF-free fed mice show increased susceptibility to bacterial infections and a microbiome shift from fibre-utilizing to mucus-degrading bacteria. Indeed, a recent clinical study found that a microbiome shift towards proteolytic bacteria preceded clinical diagnosis of UC Aims To determine whether feeding newly weaned Muc2-/- mice a FF-free versus chow or inulin-enriched diet leads to - more rapid development of spontaneous colitis - shifts in the gut microbiota towards protein fermentation Methods Newly weaned Muc2-/- mice (3–4 weeks old) were fed 1 of 3 diets: 1) usual chow (Chow; 14.7% fibre mix), 2) FF-free (10% cellulose – poorly fermented) and 3) inulin-enriched (IN; same nutritional content as FF-free, with 10% inulin instead of cellulose). Body weight, diet intake and disease activity were monitored daily. By day 10, mice in the FF-free group developed severe colitis requiring euthanization. At this time, cecal contents (short-chain fatty acid [SCFA] analysis) and colonic tissue from all mice were collected for alcian blue/PAS staining and histopathological scoring. Stool was collected for 16S rRNA sequencing Results FF-free fed mice consumed fewer calories (p=0.0073), experienced less body weight gain (p=0.002), had colonic shortening (p<0.0001) and higher disease activity scores (p<0.0001) than mice fed the IN diet. Histopathological scores were higher in FF-free versus Chow (p<0.0001) and IN (p<0.0001) fed mice. Goblet cell mucin staining was reduced in FF-free compared to Chow and IN fed mice. Beta-diversity analysis showed clear differences in microbiome composition between groups. Acetate, product of fibre fermentation, was higher in the Chow (p<0.0001) and IN (p=0.0195) groups whereas branched-chain fatty acids (BCFA), product of protein fermentation, was higher in the FF-free group (p<0.0001) Conclusions Spontaneous colitis development in FF-free fed Muc2-/- mice was observed within 10 days (5–6 weeks old) of weaning whereas Chow or IN fed mice showed minimal to no signs of colitis, respectively. A diet devoid of fibre also led to less mucin staining and a gut microbiome shift that favoured BCFA over SCFA production, suggesting the microbiota of FF-free fed Muc2-/- mice are targeting mucosal proteins concurrent with disease exacerbation. These findings support future studies examining whether consumption of low fibre diets in UC patients worsen disease outcomes whereas diets rich in fibre and/or inulin prove beneficial Funding Agencies CCC, CIHRMSFHR Trainee Award, CH.I.L.D foundation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicGut microbiota and health→French-language works237,207→