Estranged: Notes on the Historical Development of the Relationship between Players and Manufacturers of Ice Hockey Equipment in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This inquiry seeks to address the historical development of the relationship between players and manufacturers of ice hockey equipment in Canada. It pays particular attention to three inter-related trends that have affected this relationship quite decisively. First, the monopolization of equipment standards, enabled by a convergence in the interests of emerging equipment companies and hockey leagues, as the hockey manufacturing industry consolidated a solid Canadian presence throughout the twentieth century. Second, the rise of offshoring and outsourcing strategies, which set in motion a wave of factory closures and layoffs – culminating in the rather paradoxical fact that, today, almost the totality of the ice hockey equipment consumed in Canada was produced in foreign lands. Finally, the article presents what research participants perceive as a significant change in the profile of the executives who run major hockey manufacturing companies, namely the replacement of those with direct hockey experience by financial experts. The study concludes that, together, these three trends combined to drive players and manufacturers of ice hockey equipment progressively apart. The piece closes with a brief analysis of the present situation as it relates to the hockey manufacturing industry in North America.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".