A155 ASEPTIC ABSCESS SYNDROME IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE: A CASE REPORT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Aseptic abscess syndrome (AAS) is a rare extraintestinal manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and it is characterized by the formation of sterile collections of neutrophils in various organs. Misdiagnosis frequently leads to unnecessary surgical procedures and prolonged courses of antibiotics. There are only 61 reportable cases of AAS in the international literature and 2 cases in Canada. This case and the associated literature review highlight the diagnostic considerations, treatment options and disease course of this rare disease. Aims To describe a case of AAS in IBD. Methods Case report and review of the literature. Results A 24-year-old male with a history of ulcerative pancolitis (UC) initially presented with a 3-week history of malaise, abdominal pain, and fevers with a computed tomography (CT) scan showing multiple splenic abscesses. Over the next year, he had multiple readmissions for recurrent sepsis from culture negative multi-focal abscesses. Serial CT scans revealed new abscesses in the liver, scrotum, and lungs with interval progression in size. Unsuccessful attempts to isolate a culprit organism which included serological markers and cultures from blood, bronchial washings, aspirate from abscesses, and surgical tissue. All samples demonstrated frank pus with suppurative granulomatous inflammation. The patient was trialed on various courses of antibiotics without improvement. Therefore, a decision was made to treat for AAS given his IBD history. Antibiotics were discontinued and prednisone was initiated with rapid improvement in symptoms and biochemistry. In the three years following, he was transitioned to a combination of infliximab and azathioprine. He had rapid resolution of his abscesses on serial CT scans following steroid and anti-TNF therapy. Currently, he is no longer on steroids and his CRP has normalized with no recurrence of his symptoms. Conclusions AAS has often been associated with IBD, particularly Crohn’s disease and more rarely in UC. Case series have shown that AAS is not strongly associated with IBD activity as only 55% of cases have concomitant IBD flare and abscess formation. The syndrome continues to pose a diagnostic conundrum among specialists as there is no established diagnostic criteria and thus AAS remains a diagnosis of exclusion. This has led many patients to suffer from AAS for prolonged periods and receive unnecessary investigations and treatments. Steroids remain the gold standard for initial induction of remission. However, the ideal regimen for maintenance therapy is still evolving and case reports have described the effects of immunotherapy and biologics on AAS. AAS has a substantial impact on quality of life and is very responsive to therapy; this case report reminds the clinician that AAS should be considered in patients with IBD presenting with multifocal abscesses unresponsive to antimicrobials. Serial CT scan (coronal view) of abdomen demonstrating multiple hepatic abscesses (blue arrows) Funding Agencies None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".