MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4213170664 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab049.248

A249 RETROSPECTIVE CHART REVIEW OF PATIENTS WITH MALNUTRITION REQUIRING ADVANCED NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT POST BARIATRIC SURGERY

2022· article· en· W4213170664 on OpenAlexaff
Leo Leung‐Chit Tsang, Mats Fredriksen, Jennifer Jin, Leah Gramlich

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMalnutritionWeight lossParenteral nutritionSurgeryObesityMicronutrientMultivitaminOverweightComorbidityPediatricsGeneral surgeryInternal medicineVitamin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Obesity is a global pandemic with a steady increase in global BMI since 1975. Bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for patients with severe obesity in order to sustain long-term weight loss and reduce comorbidity burden and mortality associated with obesity. However, post-bariatric surgery patients face nutritional complications ranging from micronutrient deficiencies to intestinal failure requiring total parenteral nutrition (TPN). From our institution of home TPN patients, 6.4% of patients had bariatric surgery. Intestinal failure is a burdensome diagnosis for patients, and there is a paucity of literature characterizing patients post-bariatric surgery who develop intestinal failure. Aims We aim to identify the patient characteristics, surgical details, and nutritional traits that predisposed patients to developing intestinal failure requiring advanced nutritional support. Methods This is a retrospective chart review of 48 patient admitted to the Royal Alexandra Hospital post-bariatric surgery for nutritional support and followed by the TPN program dieticians and nurses. Results Our results show the mean BMI was 49.94 kg/m2 pre-bariatric surgery. Interestingly, the mean BMI at time of hospitalization for bariatric-surgery related complications was 33.210 kg/m2 which is classified as overweight but most of patients were severely malnourished with SGA C (43.8%), SGA B (29.17%), and 8.3% were SGA A. Patients requiring parenteral nutrition post-bariatric surgery are mostly female, developed barriers to oral intake, 15% engaged in medical tourism, 58.3% had an underlying mental health diagnosis, and only 18.8% were on a multivitamin even though it is standard of post-bariatric surgery care. The time between initial bariatric surgery to hospital admission was 11.2 years, and most required ≥1 revisional surgery. The mean age at bariatric surgery was 33.2-years old and the average age at initial hospitalization was 48.9-years old. Patients requiring ≥2 admissions had vertical band gastroplasty or sleeve gastrectomy (both 36.8%) while 21.1% had Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Of these patients, 39.6% of patients required ≥2 hospital admissions and the mean total days spent in hospital was 57.15 days. While these complications are uncommon, these patients result in multiple prolonged hospitalizations and can be difficult to manage. Conclusions Overall, the results of our study will allow the multidisciplinary teams that care for post-bariatric surgery patients to identify patients at risk of intestinal failure and potentially intervene with early enrollment into home nutrition program. With increasing awareness, patients at higher risk can be closely monitored in order to prevent micronutrient deficiencies before they progress to intestinal failure and require lifetime parenteral nutrition. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicBariatric Surgery and Outcomes→French-language works237,207→