MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213187531 · doi:10.1097/icb.0000000000001239

RP2 X-LINKED RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA CARRIER STATE PRESENTING WITH VASCULAR LEAKAGE AND UNILATERAL MACULAR ATROPHY

2022· article· en· W4213187531 on OpenAlexaff
Eva Raparia, Brian G. Ballios, Emily Place, Deeba Husain, Rachel M. Huckfeldt

Bibliographic record

VenueRetinal Cases & Brief Reports · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinal Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetinitis pigmentosaMedicineOphthalmologyBlind spotFluorescein angiographyAtrophyVisual acuityRetinalPathologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: We describe the unusual clinical presentation of a 33-year-old woman subsequently identified as a carrier of RP2-associated X-linked retinitis pigmentosa. METHODS: Case report. RESULTS: A 33-year-old woman without a known family history of retinal disease presented with unilateral reduced visual acuity and central scotoma in the left eye. Examination showed underlying macular atrophy in the left eye and a bilateral tapetal-like reflex. Full-field electroretinogram was abnormal in the left eye but normal in the right eye. Notable findings on wide-field imaging included bilateral peripheral vascular leakage on fluorescein angiography and a bilaterally symmetric radial pattern of hyperfluorescence on fundus autofluorescence. Genetic testing demonstrated a pathogenic variant in the gene RP2 confirming that she was a carrier of X-linked retinitis pigmentosa. CONCLUSION: We describe clinical features of the carrier state of RP2-XLRP and expand potential findings to include peripheral vascular leakage. This case highlights the importance of awareness of the carrier state, particularly if a family history cannot be provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.805
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRetinal Cases & Brief ReportsSame topicRetinal Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207