Gaussian Process Regression Model for Crop Biophysical Parameter Retrieval from Multi-Polarized C-Band SAR Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biophysical parameter retrieval using remote sensing has long been utilized for crop yield forecasting and economic practices. Remote sensing can provide information across a large spatial extent and in a timely manner within a season. Plant Area Index (PAI), Vegetation Water Content (VWC), and Wet-Biomass (WB) play a vital role in estimating crop growth and helping farmers make market decisions. Many parametric and non-parametric machine learning techniques have been utilized to estimate these parameters. A general non-parametric approach that follows a Bayesian framework is the Gaussian Process (GP). The parameters of this process-based technique are assumed to be random variables with a joint Gaussian distribution. The purpose of this work is to investigate Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) models to retrieve biophysical parameters of three annual crops utilizing combinations of multiple polarizations from C-band SAR data. RADARSAT-2 full-polarimetric images and in situ measurements of wheat, canola, and soybeans obtained from the SMAPVEX16 campaign over Manitoba, Canada, are used to evaluate the performance of these GPR models. The results from this research demonstrate that both the full-pol (HH+HV+VV) combination and the dual-pol (HV+VV) configuration can be used to estimate PAI, VWC, and WB for these three crops.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".