MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Assay for Evaluating the Abundance of <em>Vibrio Cholerae</em> and Its O1 Serogroup Subpopulation Directly from Water Without DNA Extraction

2022· preprint· en· W4213207254 on OpenAlexafffund
Tania Nasreen, Nora A.S. Hussain, Jia Yee Ho, Vanessa Zie Jie Aw, Munirul Alam, Stephanie K. Yanow, Yan Boucher

Bibliographic record

VenuePreprints.org · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVibrio bacteria research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersDirectorate for Biological SciencesAlberta InnovatesUniversity of AlbertaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsVibrio choleraeCholeraOutbreakWaterborne diseasesDetection limitBiologyDNA extractionSource trackingMicrobiologyEnvironmental scienceVirologyChemistryGeneBacteriaPolymerase chain reactionGeneticsChromatographyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cholera is a severe diarrheal disease caused by Vibrio cholerae, a natural inhabitant of brackish water. Effective control of cholera outbreaks depends on prompt detection of the pathogen from clinical specimens and tracking its source in the environment. Although the epidemiology of chol-era is well studied, rapid detection of V. cholerae remains a challenge, and data on its abundance in environmental sources are limited. Here, we describe a sensitive molecular quantification as-say by qPCR, which can be used on-site in low resource settings directly on water without the need for DNA extraction. This newly optimized method exhibited 100% specificity for total V. cholerae as well as V. cholerae O1 and allowed detection of as few as three target genome copies per reaction. The limit of detection is as low as 5 × 10E3 genome copies/L of water after concentrat-ing biomass from the sample. The ability to perform qPCR directly on water samples, portable features of the equipment, stability of the reagents at 4°C and user-friendly online software facili-tate fast quantitative analysis of V. cholerae. These characteristics make this assay extremely use-ful for field research in resource-poor settings and could support continuous monitoring in cholera endemic areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePreprints.orgSame topicVibrio bacteria research studiesFrench-language works237,207