MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213233961 · doi:10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100053

Improving emergency care through a dedicated redesigned obstetrics and gynecology emergency unit at the Women's Hospital, Doha, Qatar

2022· article· en· W4213233961 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Huda Saleh, Zeena Al Monsoori, A. Serour, Olubunmi Oniya, Justin C. Konje

Bibliographic record

VenueAJOG Global Reports · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEmergency and Acute Care Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTriageObstetrics and gynaecologyMedicineAuditMedical emergencyEmergency departmentHealth careEmergency medicineObstetricsPregnancyNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Emergencies in obstetrics and gynecology are important causes of morbidity and mortality. Consequently, the World Health Organization introduced the concept of emergency obstetrical and newborn care aimed at reducing maternal mortality by 75%. Worldwide, 15% of all births result in life-threatening complications during pregnancy. The Women's Hospital in Doha, Qatar, experienced a steady increase in births from approximately 13,000 in 2013 to more than 17,000 in 2016. This was accompanied by a rapid increase in the number of visits to the emergency unit-the main provider of emergency obstetrics and gynecology care to approximately 70,000 patients a year-overstretching the services and affecting the quality of care. To address this rapid increase, a redesign of the emergency services was undertaken and implemented in 2012. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to present a 5-year audit of the emergency department's structural process redesign. STUDY DESIGN: We redesigned the emergency department into one of consultant-led teams of trained obstetrics and gynecology physicians, residents, and specialized nurses with immediate support from ancillary services and direct access to operating and labor rooms and wards. The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (levels I-V) was used to triage patients and determine the rapidity with which they were seen. An electronic medical record was introduced as part of the redesign, and different matrices were used to measure outcomes regularly. RESULTS: During the 5-year study period, an average of 70,000 patients were seen annually. The obstetrics-to-gynecology ratio of cases was 3:1. Using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale, most patients (63.4%) had acuity level IV. Moreover, 97% of women were seen and triaged scored within 15 minutes of presentation; furthermore, all patients with acuity level I and 95% of patients with acuity level II were seen within 15 minutes by a physician, and 89% of patients with acuity level III were seen within 60 minutes. Approximately 2.5% of patients returned to the emergency department within 48 hours of discharge, and 0.5% of patients who had been seen and discharged returned to the emergency department. Key performance indicators were exceeded in all domains, with 90% of patients rating the care they received as either excellent or good. CONCLUSION: The growing population in Qatar required improvements and innovation in services. Our results showed that innovating how emergency services can be provided results in considerable improvements in outcomes and satisfaction. Considering the peculiarities of the environments, it should be possible to adopt this approach in other settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.541
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAJOG Global ReportsSame topicEmergency and Acute Care StudiesFrench-language works237,207