Bibliographic record
Abstract
The compilation of national accounts statistics in Namibia is undertaken by the Central Bureau of Statistics department at the National Planning Commission Secretariat. Before 1995 and since 1982, the Ministry of Finance compiled the national accounts and published them in the economic review. The Ministry of finance compiled the national accounts according to the 1968 SNA. In 1995 the Central Bureau of Statistics published the national accounts statistics applying the 1993 SNA. These annual estimates are released twice a year in the national accounts publication. The first release is the preliminary estimates which are released in March of each year and the second release is the revised estimates released in August of each year. The latest publication is the national accounts 2000-2007. The national accounts publication is disseminated in hard copies and electronic format posted at the National Planning Commission Secretariat website www.npc.gov.na. Since 2001 the Central Bureau of Statistics has been compiling provisionally quarterly GDP at constant 1995 prices. The provisional quarterly GDP is released with a time lag of 90 days after the reference quarter and is published in the quarterly bulletin of the Bank of Namibia. The quarterly bulletin is available at the Bank of Namibia website www.bon.com.na. The latest national accounts estimates are based on 2004 base year.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.180 | 0.092 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".