MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4213256749 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab049.239

A240 OPIOID-INDUCED HYPEREXCITABILITY IN DRG NEURONS IS MEDIATED BY DOR-DEPENDENT ENDOCYTOSIS

2022· article· en· W4213256749 on OpenAlexaff
J Jaramillo Polanco, Cristina López López, Alan Lomax, David E. Reed, Stephen Vanner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDAMGODADLEAgonistOpioidμ-opioid receptorChemistryPharmacologyOpioid receptorNeuroscienceReceptorInternal medicineEndocrinologyMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Opioids are effective for the treatment of abdominal pain but are also associated with tolerance, and increased dosing leads to severe side effects. We previously showed that prolonged exposure to high doses of opioids evoked paradoxical hyperexcitability of colonic afferent nerves that was mediated by δ-opioid receptor (DOR) signaling. Recent studies suggest that DOR-dependent analgesia is mediated not only by G proteins but also via receptor endocytosis and downstream signaling, but it is unclear what intracellular signaling mechanisms are underlying opioid-induced hyperexcitability. Aims To examine the mechanisms underlying DOR-mediated hyperexcitability of dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons. Methods We assessed the excitability of DRG neurons isolated from C57BL/6 mice by measuring the rheobase (minimal current to elicit an action potential, i.e. lower rheobase=increased excitability) using perforated patch-clamp recordings. Dissociated neurons were exposed to a high concentration (10 µM) of the μ-opioid receptor agonist DAMGO, the DOR agonist DADLE, or the weakly internalizing DOR agonist ARM390 overnight. To examine the role of receptor endocytosis and intracellular receptor activation underlying the excitatory effect by opioids, DRG neurons exposed to DAMGO or DADLE were preincubated with the membrane-permeable opioid receptor antagonist naloxone or the endocytosis inhibitor Pitstop2. To further understand the mechanisms involved in the hyperexcitability evoked by opioid re-exposure, following overnight incubation with high concentrations of DAMGO or DADLE, neurons were washed for 1 hr and treated either with the PKA inhibitor H89 or the PKC inhibitor GFX before re-exposure to DAMGO or DADLE at a low concentration (10 nM). Results Neurons exposed to 10 µM DAMGO or DADLE were hyperexcitable (rheobase decreased 25 % and 26 % compared to controls respectively; p≤0.05, 2-way ANOVA). Naloxone and Pitstop2 blocked the increased excitability of DRG neurons induced by overnight incubations with either DAMGO or DADLE. In contrast to the hyperexcitability induced by DAMGO and DADLE, overnight incubation with 10 µM ARM390 decreased excitability (rheobase increased 31%, p≤0.05, unpaired t-test). The hyperexcitability induced by DAMGO and DADLE was reversed after a 1 hr washout but acute reapplication of a low concentration of DAMGO or DADLE (10nM) now evoked hyperexcitability (rheobase decreased 34 and 35 % respectively, p≤0.05, 2-way ANOVA). This effect was prevented by inhibiting PKC but not PKA. Conclusions Our data suggest that the DOR-dependent hyperexcitability evoked by prolonged exposure to high concentrations of opioids is dependent on receptor endocytosis and downstream PKC signaling. Targeting these pathways could mitigate the hyperexcitability of pain signaling neurons caused by high doses of opioids. Funding Agencies CCC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicPain Mechanisms and Treatments→French-language works237,207→