Automatic quantification and classification of microplastics in scanning electron micrographs via deep learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Microplastics quantification and classification are demanding jobs to monitor microplastic pollution and evaluate the potential health risks. In this paper, microplastics from daily supplies in diverse chemical compositions and shapes are imaged by scanning electron microscopy. It offers a greater depth and finer details of microplastics at a wider range of magnification than visible light microscopy or a digital camera, and permits further chemical composition analysis. However, it is labour-intensive to manually extract microplastics from micrographs, especially for small particles and thin fibres. A deep learning approach facilitates microplastics quantification and classification with a manually annotated dataset including 237 micrographs of microplastic particles (fragments or beads) in the range of 50 μm-1 mm and fibres with diameters around 10 μm. For microplastics quantification, two deep learning models (U-Net and MultiResUNet) were implemented for semantic segmentation. Both significantly outmatched conventional computer vision techniques and achieved a high average Jaccard index over 0.75. Especially, U-Net was combined with object-aware pixel embedding to perform instance segmentation on densely packed and tangled fibres for further quantification. For shape classification, a fine-tuned VGG16 neural network classifies microplastics based on their shapes with high accuracy of 98.33%. With trained models, it takes only seconds to segment and classify a new micrograph in high accuracy, which is remarkably cheaper and faster than manual labour. The growing datasets may benefit the identification and quantification of microplastics in environmental samples in future work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it