MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213281106 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab049.021

A22 IMPACT OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON FOREIGN BODY INGESTION IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

2022· article· en· W4213281106 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yishen Zhao, L Dehbidi Assadzadeh, Audrey Gallant, Savannah Gorenko-Lévêque, A Chekkal, Boris Djoukam Mbuko, Nda Mefo apos o Jean Pierre, M Dirks, Véronique Groleau, Annie Lapointe, D Ngwanou, Nelson Piché, Colette Deslandres, Jocelyn Gravel, Prévost Jantchou

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDisaster Response and Management
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIncidence (geometry)PandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PediatricsEmergency departmentDemographyImpactionSurgeryInternal medicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)Disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Foreign Body Ingestions (FBI), sometimes associated with severe complications, are a common reason for emergency unit visits in children. In Quebec, since March 2020, the restrictions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have increased the time children spend at home. We hypothesized that this could contribute to a rise in FBI incidence and severity. Aims The primary objective of our study was to evaluate the incidence as well as the clinical presentation of FBI cases seen at CHU Sainte-Justine Children’s Hospital in Montreal (CHUSJ) during the COVID-19 pandemic as compared to the two previous years. Our secondary objectives were to estimate the rate of severe FBI (involving hospitalisations and/or complications) and to evaluate the nature of the foreign bodies that were ingested. Methods All children referred to or who presented at CHUSJ for FBI between March 2018 and February 2020 (pre-pandemic) as well as between March 2020 and February 2021 (pandemic) were included (n=690). Cases of food impaction were excluded (n=78). Incidence of FBI was calculated by dividing the number of FBI cases by the total number of emergency department visits per period. Differences between the two groups were analyzed by Student T test or Chi-square test. Results Between March 2018 and February 2021, 612 patients (median age 3.5 years (1.6–5.9); 54% male) were eligible. The mean monthly number of FBI cases (min-max) in 2020–2021 was 18.6 (9–28), significantly higher than the year 2018 [16.6 (8–22)] and the year 2019 [15.5 (9–24)]; p=0.04. The incidence rate of FBI doubled during the pandemic as compared to the prepandemic group: respectively 57.5/10,000 emergency department visits and 23.2/10,000 visits (p=0.002). Almost one fourth of the cohort was hospitalized. The hospitalization rate (>1 day) was similar between the 2 periods: 8.8% before the pandemic and 7.1% during the pandemic. Digestive endoscopy was performed in 21.5% of cases, a rate similar before and during the pandemic. A total of 3.3% of the children developed complications related to FBI. This rate remained stable between the two periods. The most frequently ingested objects were coins (25.0%), toys (10.8%), button batteries (10.6%), magnets (6.2%), and jewellery (6.2%). There was no significant difference in the nature of FB ingested between the 2 periods although the number of magnet ingestions increased during the pandemic (18 per year vs 10 per year). Conclusions The incidence of FBI increased significantly during the pandemic in comparison with the two previous years. The high hospitalization and complications rates, although stable during the pandemic, underline the significant impact of pediatric FBI. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationallow
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.186
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicDisaster Response and ManagementFrench-language works237,207