Ultra‐Wideband, Polarization‐Independent, Wide‐Angle Multilayer Swastika‐Shaped Metamaterial Solar Energy Absorber with Absorption Prediction using Machine Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper proposes a double layer of gold multipattern swastika (DLMP) resonator based on SiO2 substrate. The average absorption of 95% is achieved for the DLMP metasurface‐based solar absorber in the spectrum (0.1–3 μm) covering the ultraviolet, visible, near‐infrared (NIR), and some range of mid‐infrared regions which makes proposed solar energy absorber ultra‐wideband. The absorptance rate of more than 90% is achieved for the bandwidth of 2516 nm, in absorptance spectrum of 0.314 to 2.830 μm. Shape analysis is also carried out for proposed structure with simulations of five variations and comparative analysis in terms of absorptance response under solar radiation is also presented to check the effect of shape variation on absorption. Furthermore, the influence of several structural parameters on absorptance spectra is also investigated. It is also observed that the absorptance spectrum of proposed solar absorber is angle insensitive for the range of 0° to 70° and is also polarization insensitive. General regression neural network is used to build regression models which can learn and predict the behavior of absorbers in assorted conditions. Experimental results prove that these models can predict the absorber behavior with high accuracy and can reduce the simulation time, resource requirements by 80%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".