Globalne wyzwania w zarządzaniu transportem lotniczym
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1.\tKharchenko V., Bugayko D., Foriash M. New Technologies in the Global AeroSpace Engineering Education. Logistics and Transport - Wroclaw: Mi^dzynarodowa Wyzsza Szkola Logistyki i Transportu we Wroclawiu. - 2014. - №4 (24). - s. 37 - 44. \n2.\t Peter Jacobs. 12 Reasons Why Flying Is The Safest Way To Travel. Dost^pne na: <http://www.businessinsider.com/flying-is-still-the-safest-way-to-travel-2013-7?op=1>. \n3.\t ICAO Strategic Objectives 2014-2016. Dost^pne\tna: <http://www.icao.int/about- icao/pages/strategic-objectives.aspx>. \n4.\tKharchenko V., Bugayko D., Bo W.. Fundamentals of Safety and Efficiency of the Next Generation Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Protokoly szostego swiatowego kongresu «Aviation in the XXI-st century», «Safety in Aviation and Space Technologies», 23-25 wrzesnia 2014, Kijow/ NAU. - Kijow, 2014. - t. 2. - s. 2.29-2.35. \n5.\tSafety Management Manual (SMM): ICAO, Doc 9859 AN/460 (wydanie trzcie) - Montreal: ICAO, 2013. - 251 s. \n6.\tICAO Safety Report (Wydanie 2014). - Montreal: ICAO, 2014. - 35 s. \n7.\tBugayko D., Kulyk M., Ilienko O., Safety of Aviation in Global Context of the World Air Transport Development Proceedings of the NAU. - K.: NAU, 2013. - №3. - P. 112-117. \n8.\tFAA Aerospace Forecast Fiscal\tYears\t2015-2035\t(OK 15-0814).\tDost^pne\tna: \nhttp://<www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/apl/aviation_forecasts/aerospace_fore casts/2015-2035/media/FAA_Aerospace_Forecasts_FY_2015- 2035.pdf+&cd=2&hl=ru&ct=clnk&gl=ua>. \n9.\tOutlook for Air Transport to the Year 2025: ICAO, CIR 313/ AT 134 - Montreal: ICAO, 2007. - 57 s. \n10.\tAirbus Global Market Forecast\t2012\t-\t2031,\tAirbus 2012.\tDost^pne\tna: \n<http://www.airbus.com/company/market/forecast/%3FeID%3Ddam_frontend_push%26docID% 3D26347+&cd=2&hl=ru&ct=clnk&gl=ua>. \n11.\tICAO Safety Report (Wydanie 2013) - Montreal: ICAO, 2013. - 28 s. \n12.\t37th ICAO Assembly - Declaration on Aviation Security. Dost^pne na: <http://www.icao.int/Security/Documents/Bahrain/ICAO%20Declaration%20on%20Aviation%20 Security.pdf.>. \n13.\tIATA Security Management Systems (SEMS) for Air Transport Operators (Executive Summary, \nMarch\t2011).\tDost^pne\tna: \n<http://www.iata.org/whatwedo/security/Documents/SeMS_ExSumm_March2011.pdf+&cd=1&h l=ru&ct=clnk&gl=ua>. \n14.\tA. Wald, Sequential Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Nowy Jork, 1947. \n15.\tGlobal aviation safety plan. - Montreal, Kanada. - czerwiec 2009. - 23 s. \n16.\tReva A.N. Human factor and flight safety: (Research of proactive influence) : monografia / A.N. Reva, K.M. Tymishev, A.A. Bekmuhmambetov; opieka naukowa A.N. Reva, K.M. Tymishev. - Alamty, 2006. - 242 s. \n17.\tKharchenko V.P. Solution taking by air-navigation system operator: monografia / V.P. Kharchenko, T.F. Shmeluova, Y.V. Skirda. - Kirovograd: KFA NAU, 2012. - 292 s. \n18.\tICAO: Safety Management Manual (SMM): Doc. ICAO 9859 - AN / 474. - Montreal, Kanada, 2009. \n19.\tFomenko Y.M. Risk triangle in system analysis of ait traffic controllers professional activity / Y.M. Fomenko // Problems of informatization and control: scientific digest. / Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki Ukrainy, National Aviation University. - K.: NAU, 2006. - № 3. - s. 147-151. \n20.\tReva O.M. Proactive risk management on basis of human factor in civil aviation / O.M. Reva, S.I. Osadchiy, O.M. Medvedenko, Y.M. Fomenko // Railroad transport of Ukraine: theoretical and practical magazine, 2008. - № 6. - s. 54-59. \n21.\tZadeh L. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning: tlumaczenie z j§z. angielskiego. N.I. Ringo / K. Zadeh; wyd. N.N. Moiseeva, S.A. Orlovskogo. -M.: Mir, 1976. - 165 s. \n22.\tKaufman A. Introduction into fuzzy set theory: tlumaczenie z jçz. francuskiego. V.B. Kuzmina/ A. Kaufman; wyd. S.I. Travkina. - M.: Radio and communications, 1982. - 432 s. \n23.\tPolojenets G.A. Exploitation factors influence on the flight safety taking into account their interaction [maszynopis]: streszczenie pracy doktorskiej 05.22.20, National Aviation University. - K.: NVF Slavutich-Delphi, 2013. - 20 s. \n24.\tICAO: Threat and Error Management (TEM) in Air Traffic Control : Cir. ICAO 314 - AN / 178. - Montreal, Kanada, 2008. \n25.\tIntroduction to Safety Management Systems for Air Operators [Tekst]: Advisory Circular No 120-92, FAA USA, 2006. \n26.\tSharov V.D. About some mathematical and logical restrictions for risk matrices appliance in the flight safety management system [tekst] / V.D. Sharov// Biuletyn naukowy MGTU GA Air transport exploitation series. - M.: MGTU GA, 2009. - № 149. - s. 179-181. \n27.\tMushik E. Technical solutions acceptance methods [tekst]: tlumaczenie z jçz. niemieckiego V.M. Ivanova / E. Mushik, P. Miller. - M.: Mir, 1990. - 208 s. \n28.\tCox L. What’s Wrong with Risk Matrices? [tekst] / L. Cox // Risk Analyses, t. 28, No 2, 2008, s. 497-512. \n29.\tLevashov S.P. Professional risk expert estimation method [tekst] / S.P. Levashov// Lifeware safety: scientifically-practical and educationally-methodical magazine, 2009. - № 1 (97). - s. 14-16. \n30.\tAdler Y.P. Experiment planning while searching for optimal conditions [tekst] / Y.P. Adler, E.V. Markova, Y.V. Granovskiy. - M.: Nauka, 1976. - 278 s. \n31.\tReva O.M. Estimation scales point fuzzyfication/defuzzyfication procedure [tekst] / V.V. Kamishin, O.M. Reva, L.M. Makarenko, O.M. Medvedenko // Electronics and control systemsa: magazyn naukowy. - K.: NAU-print, 2012. - № 3 (33). - s. 53-62. \n32.\tBerj K. Graph theory and its appliance [tekst]: tlumaczenie z jçz. francuskiego / K. Berj. - M.: IL, 1962. - 320 s. \n33.\tBloomberg V.A. Which solution is better? Priorities rearrangement method [tekst] / V.A. Bloomberg, V.F. Glushchenko. - L.: Lenizdat, 1982. - 160 s. \n34.\tReva A.N. Urgent area of ICAO „risk triangle” solution proactive models development / A.N. Reva, V.I. Vdovichenko, S.P. Borsuk [i in.] // Modern transport power-plants, technologies and maintenance equipment: 4 ukrainska konferencja teoretyczna i praktyczna. - Kherson, 9-11 pazdziernika 2013, - Kherson: HDMA, 2013. - s. 334-338. \n35.\tChinchenko Y.V. Risks and threats estimation on the air traffic controller’s workplace with help of fuzzy sets / Y.V. Chinchenko // National aviation university bulletin: scientific magazine. / Ministerstwo Nauki i Edukacji Ukrainy, National Aviation University - K.: NAU-print, 2011. - № 2. - s. 44-49. \n36.\tDubois D. Fuzzy sets and systems - Theory and applications. / D. Dubois, H. Prade; Academic press, Nowy Jork, 1980. - 393 s. \n37.\tReva O.M. Fuzzy model of air traffic controller attitude to risk of potentially conflict situation happening / O.M. Reva, S.P. Borsuk // Ministerstwo Nauki i Edukacji Ukrainy, National Airspace University im. M.E. Zjukovskiya «HAI». - H., 2013. - № 10 (107). - s. 214-221. \n38.\tReva O.M. Air traffic controllers pretension level with workload parameters / O.M. Reva, B.M. Mirzoev, P.S. Mukhtarov, S.S. Nasirov// Air-space technique and technology: theoretical practical magazine. / Ministerstwo Nauki i Edukacji Ukrainy, National Airspace University im. M.E. Zjukovskiya «HAI». - H., 2013. - № 8 (105). - s. 273-281. \n39.\tKharchenko V., Borsuk S., Reva O. Multiplication of Air Accidents Frequency and Hazard Desirability Coefficients for ICAO Safety Risk Tolerability Matrix Solution // Logistics and Transport. - 2015. - № 1(25). - s. 63-70. \n40.\tBugayko D., Safety and Effectiveness of Civil Aviation in Conditions of Air Traffic Globalization // Protokoly V Swiatowego Kongresu «Aviation in the XXI-st century», «Safety in Aviation and Space Technologies», 25-27 wrzesnia 2012, Kijow / NAU. - Kijow, 2012. - t. 2. - s. 3.1.26¬3.1.28. \n41.\tEurocontrol flight movement forecasts to 2019. Dostpne na: <http://centreforaviation.com/analysis/eurocontrol-flight-movement-forecasts-to-2019-go-east- young-man-100117>. \n42.\tCurrent Market Outlook 2013-2032, Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Seattle, 2013. \n43.\tChynchenko, Yu. V. Outlines of operational risk assessment with ARMS methodology. Materialy XI Mi^dzynarodowej Konferencji Naukowo-Technicznej „AVIA-2013”. 2013. t. 2. s. 8.41-8.44. \n44.\tGuide to Methods & Tools for Safety Analysis in Air Traffic Management. USA, GAIN Working Group B. 2003. \n45.\tKharchenko V., Chynchenko Yu. Concept of air traffic flow and capacity management in European region. Materialy National Aviation University. 2013. Nr 3. s. 7-12. \n46.\tKharchenko V., Chynchenko Yu. Integrated risk picture methodology for air traffic management in Europe. Materialy National Aviation University. 2013. Nr 1. s. 15-19. \n47.\tKharchenko V.P., Chynchenko Yu. V. Principles of Eurocontrol air navigation system safety assessment methodology. Materialy XI mi^dzynarodowej konferencji naukowo-technicznej „AVIA-2013”. 2013. t. 2. s. 8.13-8.16. \n48.\tKharchenko V.P., Chynchenko Yu. V. Integrated safety management system in air traffic services. Materialy NAU. - 2014. - № 1(58). - s. 6-10. \n49.\tMilestone Deliverable D1: Air Transport Framework - The Current Situation - DLM-0602-001- 03-00. Bruksela: Eurocontrol, 2006 - 72 s. \n50.\tMilestone Deliverable D2: Air Transport Framework - The Performance Target - DLM-0607- 001-02-00. Bruksela: Eurocontrol, 2006 - 100 s. \n51.\tMilestone Deliverable D3: ATM Target Concept - DLM-0612-001-02-00. Bruksela: Eurocontrol, \n2007\t- 108 s. \n52.\tMilestone Objective Plan D4: ATM Deployment Sequence - MGT-0506-004-03-00. Bruksela: Eurocontrol, 2008 - 163 s. \n53.\tMilestone Objective Plan D5: ATM Master Plan - MGT-0506- 005-03-00. Bruksela: Eurocontrol, \n2008\t- 123 s. \n54.\tMilestone Objective Plan D6: Work Programme for 2008-2013 - MGT-0506-00
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.423 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".