Penggunaan Operkulum dalam Penentuan Umur pada Rhinoclavis sinensis Gmelin 1791 (Gastropoda: Cerithiidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Age determination of the sample specimen is very important for population dynamic research of R. sinensis (Gastropoda : Cerithiidae). Operculum is a “hard” part stick on the dorsal portion of the foot of gastropods. Operculum appeared on the day of the snails are born and have their own specific shape, size, and materials composition. The aim of this research was to describe the use of operculum in age determination of R. sinensis. The method used in this research was: the operculums were soaked into saturated sodium hydroxide, washed and mounted them in Canada balsam, and observed using binocular microscope. Regression analysis was used to find the relationship between length of operculum to length of shell, and number of adventicious layers of operculum to length of shell. The research resulted that the length of operculum was comparable with the shell length, with the regression line of Y=0.113X +1.898 (R2=0.857). The growth of adventitious’ layers of the operculum coincided with the growth of the shell that in the second year, the growth of adventitious layers was two layers a year. At the age of three and four, the growth was one layer a year. During the fifth, sixth and seventh years, the growth was only a layer within three years. The regression line was Y=0.168X (R2=0.872).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".