A New V-Net Convolutional Neural Network Based on Four-Dimensional Hyperchaotic System for Medical Image Encryption
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the transmission of medical images, if the image is not processed, it is very likely to leak data and personal privacy, resulting in unpredictable consequences. Traditional encryption algorithms have limited ability to deal with complex data. The chaotic system is characterized by randomness and ergodicity, which has advantages over traditional encryption algorithms in image encryption processing. A novel V-net convolutional neural network (CNN) based on four-dimensional hyperchaotic system for medical image encryption is presented in this study. Firstly, the plaintext medical images are processed into 4D hyperchaotic sequence images, including image segmentation, chaotic system processing, and pseudorandom sequence generation. Then, V-net CNN is used to train chaotic sequences to eliminate the periodicity of chaotic sequences. Finally, the chaotic sequence image is diffused to change the raw image pixel to realize the encryption processing. Simulation test analysis demonstrates that the proposed algorithm has better effect, robustness, and plaintext sensitivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it