MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213374262 · doi:10.3390/en15041526

The Impact of Water Hammer on Hydraulic Power Units

2022· article· en· W4213374262 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergies · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWater hammerOverpressureHydropowerClosure (psychology)Hydraulic machineryHydraulic structureTransient (computer programming)HydraulicsEnvironmental scienceEngineeringMechanicsGeotechnical engineeringComputer scienceMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Water hammer influences the life cycle of hydraulic passages and may even cause catastrophic structural failures. Several catastrophic failures of hydraulic power units have been reported in the literature due to the effects of transient regimes. The objective of the study is to highlight the global trend in water hammer assessment and to quantify the effect of factors influencing overpressure in hydraulic passages during load rejection in different hydropower plants. A brief and concise literature review is conducted to document the parameters associated with the water hammer phenomenon and to thereby identify the necessary prerequisites to validate theoretical and numerical results against experimental data. The purpose of the analysis is to identify extreme transient loads on hydraulic passages in order to properly adapt hydropower unit operation, to make recommendations for design and industry, and to guide the progress of adapted models and numerical simulations to capture complex phenomena. Empirical correlations are determined based on the experimental data that are transferable from one unit to another, even if a deep flow analysis is performed. The experimental results confirm that the rapid closure rate of the guide vanes has a significant impact on the phenomenon. A third order polynomial equation is applied to capture the general overpressure trends. Equation parameters change from case to case depending on the type of hydraulic power unit, closing rate and the type of hydraulic passage. The results confirm also that overpressure values depend significantly on other factors, some of which are not usually taken into account (e.g., runner speed). Experimental correlations make it possible to understand the water hammer phenomenon, which could help not just assessing and optimizing loads, but also verifying and validating more complex physical models, to ensure that hydraulic passages are reliable. A well-documented analysis also makes it possible to optimize equipment design, improve and adapt maintenance programs and to recommend appropriate operating parameters to increase equipment lifespan, while preventing incidents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it