MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering Cross Section at High Bjorken <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2022· article· lv· W4213398465 on OpenAlexafffund
Frédéric Georges, M. N. H. Rashad, A. Stefanko, M. Dlamini, B. Karki, S.F. Ali, P.-J. Lin, H. S. Ko, N. Israel, D. Adikaram, Z. Ahmed, H. Al-Bataineh, B. Aljawrneh, K. Allada, S. Allison, S. Alsalmi, D. Androić, K. Aniol, J. R. M. Annand, H. Ataç, T. Averett, C. Ayerbe Gayoso, X. Bai, J. Bane, S. Barcus, K. Bartlett, Vincenzo Bellini, R. Beminiwattha, J. Beričič, D. Biswas, E. J. Brash, D. Bulumulla, J. Campbell, A. Camsonne, M. Carmignotto, Joseph A. Castellano, C. Chen, J-P. Chen, T. Chetry, M. E. Christy, E. Cisbani, B. Clary, E.R. Cohen, N. Compton, J. C. Cornejo, S. Covrig Dusa, B. J. Crowe, S. Danagoulian, T. W. Danley, F. De Persio, W. Deconinck, M. Defurne, C. Desnault, D. Di, M. Duer, B. Duran, R. Ent, C. Fanelli, G. Franklin, E. Fuchey, C. Gal, D. Gaskell, T. Gautam, O. Glamazdin, K. Gnanvo, V. M. Gray, C. Gu, T. J. Hague, G. Hamad, D. Hamilton, K. Hamilton, O. Hansen, F. Hauenstein, W. Henry, D. W. Higinbotham, T. Holmstrom, T. Horn, Yanping Huang, G. M. Huber, C. E. Hyde-Wright, H. Ibrahim, C-M. Jen, Kai Jin, M. Jones, A. Kabir, C. Keppel, V. Khachatryan, P. M. King, S. Li, W. B. Li, J. Liu, H. Liu, A. Liyanage, J. A. Magee, S. Malace, J. Mammei, P. Markowitz, Elizabeth McClellan, M. Mazouz, F. Meddi, D. Meekins, K. Mesik, R. Michaels, A. Mkrtchyan, R. Montgomery, C. Muñoz Camacho, L. S. Myers, P. Nadel-Turoński, S. J. Nazeer, V. Nelyubin, D. Nguyen, N. Nuruzzaman, M. Nycz, O. F. Obretch, Li Ou, C. Palatchi, B. Pandey, S. Park, K. Park, C. Peng, R. Pomatsalyuk, E. Pooser, A. J. R. Puckett, V. Punjabi, B. Quinn, S. Rahman, P. E. Reimer, J. Roche, I. Sapkota, A. Sarty, B. Sawatzky, N. H. Saylor, Barak Schmookler, M. Shabestari, A. Shahinyan, S. Širca, G. R. Smith, S. Sooriyaarachchilage, N. Sparveris, R. Spies, T. Su, A. Subedi, V. Sulkosky, A. Sun, L. A. Thorne, Y. Tian, N. Ton, F. Tortorici, R. Trotta, G. M. Urciuoli, E. Voutier, B. Waidyawansa, Y. Wang, B. Wojtsekhowski, S. A. Wood, Xin Yan, L. Ye, Z. Ye, C. Yero, J. Zhang, Y. X. Zhao, Peng Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's UniversityDalhousie UniversityUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of Regina
FundersNuclear PhysicsHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueThomas Jefferson National Accelerator FacilityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean CommissionU.S. Department of EnergyInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesOffice of ScienceAgence Nationale de la RechercheNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsCompton scatteringNucleonPartonHelicityParticle physicsCross section (physics)ScatteringNuclear physicsElectronHadronQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report high-precision measurements of the deeply virtual Compton scattering (DVCS) cross section at high values of the Bjorken variable x_{B}. DVCS is sensitive to the generalized parton distributions of the nucleon, which provide a three-dimensional description of its internal constituents. Using the exact analytic expression of the DVCS cross section for all possible polarization states of the initial and final electron and nucleon, and final state photon, we present the first experimental extraction of all four helicity-conserving Compton form factors (CFFs) of the nucleon as a function of x_{B}, while systematically including helicity flip amplitudes. In particular, the high accuracy of the present data demonstrates sensitivity to some very poorly known CFFs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review Letters→Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies→French-language works237,207→