Development and testing of a universal aerosol conditioner
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A general purpose aerosol conditioning device called the Universal Aerosol Conditioner (UAC) has been designed and tested. The device may be used to condition an aerosol in multiple ways: dilute the entire aerosol (gas- and particle-phase), dilute only a gas-phase component of the aerosol without diluting the particle concentration, denude the aerosol by removing semi-volatile material from the particle phase, and humidify or dehumidify an aerosol. The UAC accomplishes these processes by bringing the aerosol into contact with sheath air and allowing enough time for gas-phase components of the aerosol to diffuse into the sheath flow. A model was developed to assess the theoretical performance of the UAC and was solved numerically. From the model it was determined that two parameters dictated the rate of diffusion between the two flows: the Péclet number and the ratio of sheath-to-aerosol flow rates. A prototype was designed and built and the theory of operation was experimentally validated by measuring the particle penetration efficiency and the gas dilution factor at various particle sizes and flow conditions. The results showed that at low aerosol and sheath flows, the prototype behaved closely to the theoretical model but diverged from the theory once the sheath flows were increased, presumably due to mixing between the two flows.Copyright © 2022 American Association for Aerosol Research
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".