Research through action: Study design and protocol on the implementation of an integrated place-based primary intervention in a multicultural context
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Our project specifically aims at improving the adaptation capacity of primary services in order to answer the complex needs of vulnerable people. The aim is to co-build, with our collaborators and partners, environment-based strategies enabling the coordination of primary services offered by health, social and community responders all the while ensuring the continuity of care (informational, relational and contact) of vulnerable people, especially refugees. A particular attention is brought toward the experiential knowledge of the health system users. This is why at least three citizen-partners are part of the research team since the beginning of the project.Goals: This research-action aims at implementing a “meshing innovation”, meaning an intervention that is integrated, lasting and based on the needs of a community located in a Sherbrooke neighbourhood in order to improve the care of refugee people in a continuum of primary services. To reach this goal, we have 5 specific objectives. The overall goal of this project is to improve the services trajectory in the health and social services network for refugee people in Quebec. The implementation of a meshing innovation, through this pilot project, is a first step toward this overall goal. Method: This project falls within a participative research approach, based on the symmetry principle of the researchers and field stakeholders’ knowledge. To do so, we choose three distinct sources of data: (1) literature review, (2) focus group (N=9 twice), and (3) semi-structured interviews (N=10).Expected results: Concretely, an Implementation guide of establishment strategies for integrated interventions enabling the improvement of primary care for refugees will be written and will constitute the basis for an appropriation workshop for the members of the two joint research networks focused on primary practices (RRAPPL) (Université de Laval and Université de Sherbrooke) and, eventually, in other fields interested in adapting and implementing these strategies. In addition to this guide, we wish to facilitate the care of refugees by family practitioners of the territory; this is why many of them are part of the project. Explicit ties will help raising awareness toward other family practitioners working in medical clinics of the territory while trying to facilitate a specific attribution to these practitioners through the Quebec Family Doctor Finder (GAMF). With this project, we strongly hope to promote the vulnerability factors of refugees to the Health and Social Services Department (MSSS) and to the Quebec General Practitioners Federation (FMOQ) in order to change the priority at the GAMF. Finally, a scientific publication will be written for an international journal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.228 | 0.130 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.011 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.062 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".