MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213457394 · doi:10.1109/tac.2022.3154347

Enhanced P-Type Control: Indirect Adaptive Learning From Set-Point Updates

2022· article· en· W4213457394 on OpenAlexaff
Ronghu Chi, Huaying Li, Dong Shen, Zhongsheng Hou, Biao Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsIterative learning controlControl theory (sociology)LinearizationNonlinear systemComputer scienceController (irrigation)Linear systemAdaptive controlConvergence (economics)Scheme (mathematics)Feedback linearizationMathematicsControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, an indirect adaptive iterative learning control (iAILC) scheme is proposed for both linear and nonlinear systems to enhance the P-type controller by learning from set points. An adaptive mechanism is included in the iAILC method to regulate the learning gain using input–output measurements in real time. An iAILC method is first designed for linear systems to improve control performance by fully utilizing model information if such a linear model is known exactly. Then, an iterative dynamic linearization (IDL)-based iAILC is proposed for a nonlinear nonaffine system, whose model is completely unknown. The IDL technique is employed to deal with the strong nonlinearity and nonaffine structure of the systems such that a linear data model can be attained consequently for the algorithm design and performance analysis. The convergence of the developed iAILC schemes is proved rigorously, where contraction mapping, two-dimensional (2-D) Roesser’s system theory, and mathematical induction are employed as the basic analysis tools. Simulation studies are provided to verify the developed theoretical results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations129
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Automatic ControlSame topicIterative Learning Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207