MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214496514 · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3153470

An Automatic CADI’s Ionogram Scaling Software Tool for Large Ionograms Data Analytics

2022· article· en· W4214496514 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTime Series Analysis and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTata Institute of Fundamental Research
KeywordsComputer scienceScalingAlgorithmIonogramArtificial intelligenceMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scale the ionosonde ionograms to produce accurate readings is a professional manual scaling technique. However, there is a high demand for auto-scaling software that can manage a large number of ionograms in order to avoid the time and effort involved in manual scaling as well as human errors. Noise-free, accurate trace identification and precise segmentation are required for the auto-scaling program to work. The Canadian Advanced Digital Ionosonde (CADI) ionograms are processed and auto-scaled using a new model on an open-source (Python) platform in this paper. Filtering the noise, Convolution Neural Network (CNN) based trace detection, layer-wise segmentation, and then extracting the ionospheric features are used to accomplish the scaling accuracy. The investigation uses raw ionogram files generated by the CADI system in Hyderabad, India (Lat: <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$17.47^{\circ }\text{N}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> , Long: <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$78.57^{\circ }\text{E}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> ) between 2014 and 2015. Raw ionograms in <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$^\ast $ </tex-math></inline-formula> .md4 or <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$^\ast $ </tex-math></inline-formula> .md2 file formats can be accepted by the suggested model (Individual or Hourly integrated). The proposed auto-scaling software tool’s individual block performance is examined with several classes of ionograms, and the overall performance is evaluated with a huge set of ionograms obtained during adverse space weather circumstances (16th to 18th March 2015). Univap Digital Ionosonde Data Analysis (UDIDA) software tool was considered for manual scaling. The results of manual scaling are compared with that of proposed scaling software. In fmin and h’f, respectively, the proposed model has a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.36 MHz and 11.72 km, and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.7 MHz and 22.36 km.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.868
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it