MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214505337 · doi:10.1016/j.fmre.2021.11.037

Multiple access interference suppression for CDMA systems via <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si3.svg"><mml:msub><mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mi>∞</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math>-minimization

2022· article· lv· W4214505337 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFundamental Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiuser detectionAlgorithmRobustness (evolution)Code division multiple accessComputer scienceMultipath propagationDetectorWaveformTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A key problem in code-division multiple access (CDMA) system is to mitigate the multiple access interference (MAI) from other users while detecting the desired user. The performance of the conventional minimum output energy (MOE) multiuser detector for CDMA system significantly degrades in the presence of signature waveform distortions induced by multipath propagation or timing asynchronism. In this paper, a robust linear programming (ROLP) algorithm for blind multiuser detection is proposed. Different from the existing MOE-based multiuser detection techniques, the proposed ROLP minimizes the ℓ∞-norm of the output to exploit the non-Gaussianity of the communication signals. To achieve robustness against signature waveform mismatch, the proposed method constrains the magnitude response of any signature vector within a specified uncertainty set to exceed unity. The uncertainty set is modeled as a rhombus, which differs from the spherical uncertainty region widely taken in the existing robust multiuser detectors. The resulting optimization problem is reformulated into a linear programming program and hence can be solved efficiently. The proposed ROLP is computationally simpler than its robust counterparts that requires solving a second-order cone programming. Simulation results demonstrate the superiority of the ROLP over several robust detectors, which indicate that its performance approaches the optimal performance bound.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesOpen science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.799
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0070.013
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it