Morbidity and mortality in adults with congenital heart defects in the third and fourth life decade
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The population of adults with congenital heart defects (ACHD) is continuously growing. Data on morbidity and mortality of ACHD are limited. This longitudinal observational study examined a group of ACHD with surgically corrected or palliated congenital heart defects (CHD) during a 15-year period. METHODS: ACHD that had participated in the initial study were invited for a follow-up examination. Mortality and hospitalization data were compared with a healthy control group. RESULTS: From 05/2017 to 04/2019 a total of 249/364 (68%) ACHD participated in the follow-up study: 21% had mild, 60% moderate and 19% severe CHD. During the observational period, 290 health incidents occurred (cardiac catheterization 37%, cardiovascular surgery 27%, electrophysiological study/ablation 20%, catheter interventional treatment 14%, non-cardiac surgery 3%). Events were more frequent in ACHD with moderate (53%) and severe (87%) compared to those with mild CHD (p < 0.001). 24 individuals died at a median age of 43 years during the observation period. 29% of them had moderate and 71% severe CHD corresponding to a mortality rate of 0%, 0.29% and 1.68% per patient-year in ACHD with mild, moderate and severe CHD. Long-term survival was significantly reduced in patients with severe CHD in comparison to individuals with mild and moderate CHD (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: After correction or palliation of CHD, there was remarkable ongoing morbidity and mortality in ACHD patients over the 15-year observation period, particularly in individuals with moderate and severe CHD when compared with the general population. Thus, life-long special care is required for all surgically corrected or palliated ACHD patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".