MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214532736 · doi:10.1111/pbr.13007

Development of single nucleotide polymorphism‐based functional molecular markers from the <i>Lr22a</i> gene sequence in wheat (<scp><i>Triticum aestivum</i></scp>)

2022· article· en· W4214532736 on OpenAlexafffund
Jyoti Saini Sharma, Brent McCallum, Colin W. Hiebert

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Breeding · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersWestern Grains Research FoundationAlberta Wheat CommissionManitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural DevelopmentGenome Canada
KeywordsBiologyGeneticsSingle-nucleotide polymorphismSequence-tagged siteGenetic markerGeneMarker-assisted selectionPolymerase chain reactionVariants of PCRMolecular markerCoding regionIndelPopulationChromosomeGenotypeGene mapping

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The adult‐plant leaf rust resistant gene Lr22a confers broadly effective resistance against the fungal pathogen Puccinia triticina Eriks. ( Pt ) in wheat that has not been extensively utilized in wheat cultivars. The objective of this study was to develop robust functional molecular markers using the Lr22a gene sequence to facilitate integration of Lr22a in breeding programmes. The Lr22a coding sequence was used to identify isolated SNPs and four kompetitive allele specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (KASP) markers were developed. For marker testing, a F 2:3 population was developed by crossing a near‐isogenic line RL4495 ( Lr22a carrier) with Thatcher and phenotyped with Pt race TDBJ and genotyped with a 90K iSelect SNP array, four KASP markers and two SSR markers. A linkage map of chromosome arm 2DS that included Lr22a was constructed. The KASP markers co‐segregated with Lr22a and were validated for cross‐applicability on a panel of wheat lines. KASP markers Kwh636 , Kwh637 and Kwh638 reliably detected the presence or absence of Lr22a . The markers developed in this study will facilitate Lr22a selection in breeding programmes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score0.248

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant BreedingSame topicWheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyFrench-language works237,207