Safety and effectiveness of recombinant factor XIII‐A2 in congenital factor XIII deficiency: Real‐world evidence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Regular factor XIII (FXIII) prophylaxis is standard treatment for congenital FXIII A-subunit deficiency (FXIII-A CD). Recombinant factor XIII-A2 (rFXIII-A2) was extensively evaluated in the mentor trials. Objective To assess real-world safety and treatment effectiveness of rFXIII-A2 prophylaxis from the mentor 6 trial. Patients/Methods mentor 6 was a noninterventional, postauthorization safety study investigating rFXIII-A2 prophylaxis in FXIII-A CD. rFXIII-A2 treatment was observed for 2 to 6 years per patient. The primary end point was documentation of adverse drug reactions (including anti-FXIII antibody development). Secondary end points were serious adverse events (SAEs), medical events of special interest (MESIs), and annualized bleeding rate (ABR). Results Among 30 patients (mean age, 25.5 years), there were 44 adverse events (AEs) (30 mild, 13 moderate, 1 severe). Eleven AEs were possibly/probably related to rFXIII-A2. Of four MESIs, two were unlikely related to rFXIII-A2 (accidental overdose, deep vein thrombosis), and two were possibly/probably related (nonneutralizing anti-FXIII antibody, decreased therapeutic response). All 10 SAEs were unlikely related to rFXIII-A2. Over a follow-up of 75.4 patient-years, there were six treatment-requiring bleeds (all trauma-related with no spontaneous bleeds), giving a treatment-requiring ABR of 0.066; five bleeds were treated successfully with rFXIII-A2. Eight of nine minor surgeries performed during rFXIII-A2 prophylaxis reported successful hemostatic outcomes (one missing evaluation). Conclusions These data confirm that rFXIII-A2 prophylaxis is well tolerated as long-term care. There were no spontaneous bleeds, ABR was low, and rFXIII-A2 successfully treated bleeds in patients receiving rFXIII-A2 prophylaxis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.021 | 0.044 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".