Transfusion Ratios and Deficits in Injured Children With Life-Threatening Bleeding*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of plasma and platelet ratios and deficits in injured children with life-threatening bleeding. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the MAssive Transfusion epidemiology and outcomes In Children study dataset, a prospective observational study of children with life-threatening bleeding events. SETTING: Twenty-four childrens hospitals in the United States, Canada, and Italy. PATIENTS: Injured children 0-17 years old who received greater than 40 mL/kg total blood products over 6 hours or were transfused under activation of massive transfusion protocol. INTERVENTION/EXPOSURE: Weight-adjusted blood product volumes received during the bleeding event were recorded. Plasma:RBC ratio (plasma/RBC weight-adjusted volume in mL/kg) and platelet:RBC ratio (platelet/RBC weight-adjusted volume in mL/kg) were analyzed. Plasma deficit was calculated as RBC mL/kg - plasma mL/kg; platelet deficit was calculated as RBC mL/kg - platelet mL/kg. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 191 patients analyzed, median (interquartile range) age was 10 years (5-15 yr), 61% were male, 61% blunt mechanism, and median (interquartile range) Injury Severity Score was 29 (24-38). After adjusting for Pediatric Risk of Mortality score, cardiac arrest, use of vasoactive medications, and blunt mechanism, a high plasma:RBC ratio (> 1:2) was associated with improved 6-hour survival compared with a low plasma:RBC ratio (odds ratio [95% CI] = 0.12 [0.03-0.52]; p = 0.004). Platelet:RBC ratio was not associated with survival. After adjusting for age, Pediatric Risk of Mortality score, cardiac arrest, and mechanism of injury, 6-hour and 24-hour mortality were increased in children with greater plasma deficits (10% and 20% increased odds of mortality for every 10 mL/kg plasma deficit at 6 hr [p = 0.04] and 24 hr [p = 0.01], respectively); 24-hour mortality was increased in children with greater platelet deficits (10% increased odds of 24-hr mortality for every 10 mL/kg platelet deficit [p = 0.02)]). CONCLUSIONS: In injured children, balanced resuscitation may improve early survival according to this hypothesis generating study. Multicenter clinical trials are needed to assess whether clinicians should target ratios and deficits as optimal pediatric hemostatic resuscitation practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".