Does urinary urgency drive urinary frequency in overactive bladder?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine if reduction in urgency in patients with refractory overactive bladder syndrome (rOAB) is correlated with a reduction in voiding frequency and symptom bother. METHODS: Data from a prospective series of women with rOAB undergoing radiofrequency ablation of the subtrigonal tissue, termed selective bladder denervation (SBD), was analyzed. Main outcome measures included urgency voids, nonurgency voids, and urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) epidsodes from a 3-day voiding diary and quality of life (QoL) measures (Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form [OAB-q SF]). RESULTS: The dataset comprised 62 completer subjects at 6 months. Compared to baseline, UUI and urgency voids were lower (P < .001), but nonurgency voids were increased (P < .001) and QoL measures were improved (P < .001), but functional bladder capacity did not increase. At baseline and 6 months post treatment, symptom bother was correlated with urgency voids (P < .05) but inversely correlated with nonurgency voids (P < .001). Urgency and nonurgency voids were inversely related at baseline and at 6 months (P < .0001). Following treatment, urgency voids decreased by 41% and nonurgency voids increased by 33%. CONCLUSIONS: As with other interventions for OAB, SBD resulted in a reduction in OAB symptoms and an improvement in QoL measures. However, the decrease in urgency voids was offset by an increase in nonurgency voids, suggesting that habit or defensive voiding is a significant driver of urinary frequency. It is not certain if this is a unique finding of the SBD effect, but these data do suggest that analyses of outcomes of other OAB interventions are warranted to gain a better understanding of the genesis of OAB symptoms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".