Right Ventricular Loading by Lung Inflation during Controlled Mechanical Ventilation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Rationale The inspiratory rise in transpulmonary pressure during mechanical ventilation increases right ventricular (RV) afterload. One mechanism is that when Palv exceeds left atrial pressure, West zone 1 or 2 (non–zone 3) conditions develop, and Palv becomes the downstream pressure opposing RV ejection. The Vt at which this impact on the right ventricle becomes hemodynamically evident is not well established. Objectives To determine the magnitude of RV afterload and prevalence of significant non–zone 3 conditions during inspiration across the range of Vt currently prescribed in clinical practice. Methods In postoperative passively ventilated cardiac surgery patients, we measured right atrial, right ventricle, pulmonary artery, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, plateau pressure, and esophageal pressure during short periods of controlled ventilation, with Vt increments ranging between 2 and 12 ml/kg predicted body weight (PBW). The inspiratory increase in RV afterload was evaluated hemodynamically and echocardiographically. The prevalence of non–zone 3 conditions was determined using two definitions based on changes in esophageal pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, and plateau pressure. Measurements and Main Results Fifty-one patients were studied. There was a linear relationship between Vt, driving pressure, transpulmonary pressure, and the inspiratory increase in the RV isovolumetric contraction pressure. Echocardiographically, increasing Vt was associated with a greater inspiratory increase in markers of afterload and a decrease in stroke volume. Non–zone 3 conditions were present in >50% of subjects at a Vt ⩾ 6 ml/kg PBW. Conclusions In the Vt range currently prescribed, RV afterload increases with increasing Vt. A mechanical ventilation strategy that limits Vt and driving pressure is cardioprotective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".