The Effect of an External Electric Field on the Electronic Properties of Defective CBN Nanotubes: A Density Functional Theory Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigated the effects of applying an external electric field on the electronic properties of Stone-Wales (SW) defective carbon-boron-nitride nanotubes (CBN) using first principles calculations. The defective CBN nanotubes were modeled by introducing Stone–Wales defects in the boron-nitride segment (BN-SW), the carbon segment (C-SW), and the carbon-boron-nitride interface segment (CBN-SW). Initially, we studied the formation energies and the structural stability for all models. As a result of adding the SW defects, the calculated bandgap values of the C-SW and CBN-SW models showed significant changes compared to the pristine CBN nanotube. Meanwhile, the BN-SW model showed a slight bandgap change because of the strong covalent bonding between the boron and nitrogen atoms. Applying a transverse electric field induced a fast bandgap closing response in all models, indicating a rapid semiconductor-to-metal phase transition. The defective C-SW and CBN-SW models demonstrated unique bandgap closing patterns in response to applied transverse and longitudinal electric fields, while pristine and BN-SW models had similar bandgap responses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".