The Effect of an External Electric Field on the Electronic Properties of Defective CBN Nanotubes: A Density Functional Theory Approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigated the effects of applying an external electric field on the electronic properties of Stone-Wales (SW) defective carbon-boron-nitride nanotubes (CBN) using first principles calculations. The defective CBN nanotubes were modeled by introducing Stone–Wales defects in the boron-nitride segment (BN-SW), the carbon segment (C-SW), and the carbon-boron-nitride interface segment (CBN-SW). Initially, we studied the formation energies and the structural stability for all models. As a result of adding the SW defects, the calculated bandgap values of the C-SW and CBN-SW models showed significant changes compared to the pristine CBN nanotube. Meanwhile, the BN-SW model showed a slight bandgap change because of the strong covalent bonding between the boron and nitrogen atoms. Applying a transverse electric field induced a fast bandgap closing response in all models, indicating a rapid semiconductor-to-metal phase transition. The defective C-SW and CBN-SW models demonstrated unique bandgap closing patterns in response to applied transverse and longitudinal electric fields, while pristine and BN-SW models had similar bandgap responses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it