MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214708145 · doi:10.1051/epjconf/202226005001

First measurement of<sup>25</sup>Al+p resonant scattering relevant to the astrophysical reaction<sup>22</sup>Mg(<i>α</i>,p)<sup>25</sup>Al

2022· article· en· W4214708145 on OpenAlexaff
Jun Hu, H. Yamaguchi, Y. H. Lam, Alexander Heger, D. Kahl, Adam Michael Jacobs, Zac Johnston, Shutao Xu, N.T. Zhang, S.B. Ma, L. H. Ru, Enqiang Liu, Tong Liu, S. Hayakawa, L. Yang, Hideki Shimizu, C. B. Hamill, A. St. J. Murphy, Jun Su, Xiao Fang, K. Y. Chae, M. S. Kwag, S.M. Cha, N.N. Duy, Nguyen Kim Uyen, D.H. Kim, R. G. Pizzone, M. La Cognata, S. Cherubini, S. Romano, А. Туміно, J. F. Liang, A. Psaltis, Michele Sferrazza, D. Kim, Yingying Li, S. Kubono

Bibliographic record

VenueEPJ Web of Conferences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsProtonReaction rateNuclear reactionAtomic physicsNuclear physicsScatteringResonance (particle physics)Thermonuclear fusionParity (physics)ExcitationAnalytical Chemistry (journal)PlasmaChemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Type I X-ray bursts (XRBs) are the most frequently observed thermonuclear explosions in nature. The22Mg(α,p)25Al reaction plays a critical role in XRB models. However, experimental information is insufficient to deduce a precise22Mg(α,p)25Al reaction rate for the respective XRB temperature range. A new measurement of25Al+p resonant scattring was performed up to the astrophysically interested energy region of22Mg(α,p)25Al. Several resonances were observed in the excitation functions, and their level properties have been determined based on an R-matrix analysis. In particular, proton widths and spin-parities of four natural-parity resonances above theαthreshold of26Si, which can contribute the reaction rate of22Mg(α,p)25Al, were first experimentally determined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEPJ Web of ConferencesSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207