MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214730475 · doi:10.7326/m21-3977

Integrating Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement With Guidelines: Systematic Stakeholder-Driven Development of an Extension of the Guidelines International Network–McMaster Guideline Development Checklist

2022· editorial· en· W4214730475 on OpenAlexafffund
Thomas Piggott, Miranda Langendam, Elena Parmelli, Jan Adolfsson, Elie A. Akl, David Armstrong, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Romina Brignardello‐Petersen, Jan Brożek, Markus Follmann, I. Kopp, Joerg J Meerpohl, Luciana Neamţiu, Monika Nothacker, Amir Qaseem, Paolo Giorgi Rossi, Zuleika Saz‐Parkinson, Philip J. van der Wees, Holger J. Schünemann

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Internal Medicine · 2022
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical practice guidelines implementation
Canadian institutionsPopulation Health Research InstituteMcMaster UniversityImpact
FundersMedizinische Fakultät der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität FreiburgJoint Research CentreStatens beredning för medicinsk och social utvärderingMacquarie UniversityRadboud Universitair Medisch CentrumAlbert-Ludwigs-Universität FreiburgRadboud UniversiteitUniversiteit van AmsterdamKarolinska InstitutetAmsterdam University Medical CentersMcMaster UniversityWorld Health OrganizationEuropean CommissionHumanitas UniversityAmerican University of Beirut
KeywordsLibrary scienceStakeholderMedicineGuidelineChecklistAgency (philosophy)SociologyPolitical scienceSocial sciencePsychologyPublic relations

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contains fulltext : 251116.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.107
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.295
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score0.564

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1070.295
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0060.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.385
GPT teacher head0.516
Teacher spread0.132 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Internal MedicineSame topicClinical practice guidelines implementationFrench-language works237,207