Thermal Modelling of an Induction Motor with Liquid Cooling Optimization for Different EV Drive Cycles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Induction Motor (IM) is an alternative choice over permanent magnet motor in EV/HEV applications due to non–requirement of rare–earth magnets, greater thermal tolerance and low production costs. However, additional conductor losses in the rotor causes higher temperature in the IM which directly reduces the motor performance and in the long run it decreases motor life expectancy due to thermal stress in the rotor bars. Hence, it is critical to design and optimize the liquid cooling in induction motor to produce required torque and power for electric vehicles. Standard tests for UDDS (Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule) and HWFET (Highway Fuel Economy Driving Schedule) drive cycles are used to determine performance of traction motors in terms of torque, power, efficiency and thermal condition. This paper proposes a novel simplified Lumped Parameter Thermal Network (LPTN) model which monitors the required power and torque generation for both UDDS and HWFET driving conditions and regulates liquid coolant flow rate to the motor to maintain the motor temperature within the safe limit. A 15–hp Aluminum Rotor Induction Motor (ARIM) prototype with liquid cooling has been used for the proposed thermal model development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".