MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214743529 · doi:10.1515/9780748696604

Scotland's Referendum and the Media

2016· book· en· W4214743529 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Neil Blain, David Hutchison, Gerry Hassan

Bibliographic record

VenueEdinburgh University Press eBooks · 2016
Typebook
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicScottish History and National Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReferendumPolitical scienceMedia studiesSociologyLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Scottish Referendum and its aftermath, viewed from national and international perspectives Read an article by David Hutchison about the book on allmediascotland.com After the Referendum on whether Scotland should become an independent country in September 2014 ¬‒ and following a momentous mobilisation of voters by both the Yes and No campaigns ‒ Scotland's political environment has been fundamentally energised. But how was the Referendum campaign reported and structured in the media in Scotland, the wider United Kingdom, and in other parts of the world, and when might ‘representation’ have turned into ‘construction’? In this book scholars, commentators and journalists from Britain, Europe, Canada and Australia examine how the media across the world presented the debate itself and the shifting nature of Scottish ‒ and British ‒ identity which that debate revealed. Several of the contributors also explore how the emphases and interpretations placed on the Scottish debate by their national media illuminate attitudes to their own nationalism and separatism questions. The consequences of the No majority vote are traced in the media through until the SNP landslide in the UK general election of 2015. The issues which have subsequently come to the fore will be relevant for years to come. Contributors Neil Blain, University of Stirling Margot Buchanan, University of Stirling Catherine Côté, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec Enric Castelló, Universitat Rovira I Virgili, Tarragona Marina Dekavalla, University of Stirling Peter Golding, Northumbria University John Harris, Glasgow Caledonian University Gerry Hassan is a writer, researcher and commentator David Hutchison, Glasgow Caledonian University Anthea Irwin, University of Ulster Brian McNair, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane James Mitchell, University of Edinburgh Klaus Peter Müller, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz Hugh O’Donnell, Glasgow Caledonian University Sian Powell, Cardiff School of Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies Didier Revest, Université Nice Sophia Antipolis Kevin Rafter, Dublin City University John Robertson, University of the West of Scotland Fiona Skillen, Glasgow Caledonian University Fernando León-Solís, University of the West of Scotland Andrew Tolson, University of Leicester Christopher Waddell, Carleton University, Ottawa Karen Williamson, Northumbria University "

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.571
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEdinburgh University Press eBooksSame topicScottish History and National IdentityFrench-language works237,207