MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214771680 · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2022.3153759

Towards Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Interval Skyline Queries Over Time Series Data

2022· article· en· W4214771680 on OpenAlexafffund
Songnian Zhang, Suprio Ray, Rongxing Lu, Yandong Zheng, Yunguo Guan, Jun Shao

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Management and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Zhejiang ProvinceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceSkylineEncryptionHomomorphic encryptionSecurity analysisInformation privacyData miningDatabaseComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Outsourcing encrypted time series data and query services to a cloud has been widely adopted by data owners for economic considerations. However, it inevitably lowers data utility and query efficiency. Existing secure skyline query schemes either leak critical information or are inefficient. In this paper, we propose an efficient and privacy-preserving interval skyline query scheme by employing symmetric homomorphic encryption (SHE). Specifically, we first devise a secure sort protocol to sort the encrypted dataset and a secure high-dimensional dominance check protocol to securely determine dominance relations of time series data, in which a dominance check tree is presented. With these secure protocols, we propose our secure skyline computation protocol that can ensure both security and efficiency. Furthermore, to deal with the characteristics of time series data, we design a look-up table to index time series for quick query response. The security analysis shows that our proposed scheme can protect outsourced data, query results, and single-dimensional privacy and hide access patterns. In addition, we evaluate our proposed scheme and compare the core component of our scheme with the state-of-the-art solution, and the results indicate that our protocol outperforms the compared solution by two orders of magnitude in the computational cost and at least 23× in the communication cost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure ComputingSame topicData Management and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207