MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214812961 · doi:10.26685/urncst.319

Co-Administration of Menstrual Blood-Derived Stem Cells and Remdesivir for the Treatment of Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Induced Pneumonia: A Research Protocol

2022· article· en· W4214812961 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Cao, Daniel Jeyaraj, Henry Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePneumoniaCytokine stormAdverse effectMesenchymal stem cellClinical trialCoronavirusCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Stem cellInternal medicineDiseaseImmunologyPharmacologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)PathologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Remdesivir (Veklury), a viral ribonucleic acid (RNA)-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitor designed by Gilead Sciences, has shown reductions in recovery time for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, although its efficacy remains controversial. It has been proposed that combining remdesivir with immunomodulators may improve clinical efficacy. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) exert immunomodulatory properties, which resolve COVID-19-induced pneumonia in early-phase trials. Menstrual blood-derived stem cells (MenSCs) present a novel MSC source, superior in availability, proliferative ability, and ethicality than traditional stem cell sources. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of remdesivir-MenSC combination therapy in resolving severe COVID-19-induced pneumonia. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, controlled study will be performed to assess two primary endpoints: time of recovery, defined as no longer requiring ongoing medical care, and normalization of the immune system, defined as the change in the concentration of key cytokines from baseline. Safety will also be measured as the frequency of treatment-related adverse events (AE). The study will aim to recruit 400 eligible subjects, aged 18 to 75, hospitalized with severe COVID-19, and they will be assigned to either receive intravenous (IV) infusions of MenSCs and remdesivir, or receive only remdesivir. A stratified log-rank test will be conducted to compare the time of recovery between study arms, with stratification by disease severity (baseline ordinal score). Two-way repeated measures ANOVA will be used to compare cytokine levels over time in the treatment group compared to the control group. Discussion: We expect remdesivir-MenSC combination therapy to surpass remdesivir in clinical efficacy and safety profile by improving clinical status, lowering duration of hospitalization, reducing mortality, and lowering the incidence of treatment-related AEs. Conclusion: Investigating this promising approach is an essential step in determining the feasibility of stem cell-based treatments in improving current COVID-19 therapeutics and patient outcomes. In particular, evaluating the clinical potential of MenSCs may provide insight into future therapeutic research as the literature has shown that MenSCs are superior to traditional MSC sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.430
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.255
GPT teacher head0.538
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) JournalSame topicCOVID-19 Impact on ReproductionFrench-language works237,207