MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214815213 · doi:10.1055/s-0042-1743960

Recurrent Aseptic Meningitis in the Setting of Secondary Hypophysitis from an Enlarging Rathke's Cleft Cyst: A Case Report and Literature Review

2022· article· en· W4214815213 on OpenAlexaff
Megh M. Trivedi, Roger Murayi, João Paulo Almeida, Gabrielle Yeaney, Carlos M. Isada, Varun R. Kshettry

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull Base · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypophysitisMedicineAseptic meningitisHeadachesHypopituitarismAsymptomaticSurgeryMeningitisCystCraniopharyngiomaNeurocysticercosisRadiologyPediatricsPituitary glandInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Rathke's cleft cyst (RCC) is a benign sellar or suprasellar lesion often discovered incidentally. Often, lesions do not grow on subsequent imaging, are asymptomatic, and are treated conservatively. When symptomatic, patients will often present with refractory headaches, visual disturbances, and occasionally hypopituitarism. Occasionally, patients present with meningismus, fever and other clinical signs of meningitis. We present a case of a patient with recurrent aseptic meningitis with an enlarging RCC with surgical pathology consistent with secondary hypophysitis. An additional literature review of RCC associated hypophysitis cases was performed. Case: A 30-year-old female presented with three episodes of intractable headaches in the span of two 8 weeks. During each episode, her clinical presentation was consistent with meningitis, for which she underwent repeated lumbar punctures. No bacteria or viruses were ever isolated from cerebrospinal fluid and antimicrobial therapy was withheld. Intracranial imaging revealed a cystic sellar lesion, initially thought to be unrelated ([ Fig. 1A–D ]). On her third presentation, repeat MRI demonstrated interval rapid enlargement of the cyst with suprasellar extension, significant compression of the optic chiasm, and enhancement extending into the basal frontal lobes ([ Fig. 2A–C ]). The patient was taken for resection via an endoscopic transsphenoidal approach. Intraoperatively, mucopurulent material drained from the cyst and the cyst wall was resected. Final pathology demonstrated ciliated epithelium with focal squamous metaplasia with surrounding acute and chronic inflammation suggestive of RCC with hypophysitis. No definitive organism was isolated from intraoperative cultures. Postoperative MRI demonstrated complete resolution of the cyst ([ Fig. 3 ]). Discussion: We present here a patient with 8 weeks of recurrent aseptic meningitis with a Rathke's cleft cyst initially managed conservatively until subsequent rapid lesion growth and worsening symptoms prompted surgical evacuation. The presumed pathophysiology is rupture of the RCC triggering a potent immune response. This is supported by her recurrent meningitis symptoms with sterile CSF cultures. A literature review of RCC associated hypophysitis cases returned 32 cases with a mean age of 47.6 years and a female predominance (71.9%). The most common final histopathologic diagnosis was lymphocytic hypophysitis (34.4%) followed by xanthomatous (9.4%) and granulomatous (9.4%) hypophysitis ([ Table 1 ]). Our patient's presentation was unusual based on an 8-week time course and rapid growth of her lesion. Of the 32 identified cases of RCC associated hypophysitis in the literature, only 1 other case demonstrated interval growth prior to surgical intervention. It demonstrates the importance of re-imaging these patients when the clinical picture worsens. Conclusion: Secondary hypophysitis from a Rathke's cleft cyst is a rare presentation that can be difficult to diagnose. Our case demonstrates the unusual presentation of a rapidly enlarging RCC requiring surgical evacuation. It's important to keep ruptured RCC in the differential of symptomatic cystic sellar lesions. Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Publication History Article published online: 15 February 2022 © 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull BaseSame topicPituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207