Heart Disease Prediction Using Adaptive Infinite Feature Selection and Deep Neural Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prediction of heart disease is one of the most important fields of study in modern science. By studying data such as cholesterol levels, blood sugar, and blood pressure, heart disease can be predicted. In recent years, several machine learning techniques have been used to aid in fast prediction by learning from the data. However, the prediction accuracy still remains low. This is due to lower number of records contained in the databases available. In this paper, we propose a new method of heart disease prediction using a modified variation of infinite feature selection and multilayer perceptron. The method shows a high accuracy of 87.70%, a high F1-score of 87.21%, a high sensitivity of 88.50%, a high specificity of 87.02%, and a high precision in prediction of 86.05%. on the Cleveland, Hungarian, Switzerland, Long Beach, and Statlog datasets. For evaluation purposes, we have combined all the datasets together and then divided the combined dataset into training and test samples with a 20 % percent of the samples allocated for testing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".