Nonlinear Finite Element Structural Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beams with out of Plane Parts
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the structural behavior of the reinforced concrete beams contain out of plane parts with the straight beam by finite element analysis (FEA) using ABAQUS software package. The studied models were evaluated by comparing their results with previous experimental results of the research done by the same authors. The study focused on the effects of the number of the out of plane parts on the beams' mid span deflection, the cracking and ultimate loads, and failure mode. The obtained results showed that load bearing capacity of the beams with one, two, and three out of plane parts was lower than the capacity of the straight beam by about 35%, 33%, and 68%. In addition, the results of the beams with an even number of out of plane parts were generally better than the results of those with odd number, and the increasing number of out of plane parts changed the failure mode from flexure to combined flexure plus torsion. Finally, the FEM analysis was comparable with those obtained from the experimental procedures with an average difference ratio not exceeding 5% in the ultimate load and 7% in the deflection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it