MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Palm fronds from western Canada are the northernmost palms from the Late Cretaceous of North America and may include the oldest Arecaceae

2022· article· en· W4214824179 on OpenAlexafffundabout
David R. Greenwood, John G. Conran, Christopher K. West

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Palaeobotany and Palynology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Diversity and Evolution
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCretaceousFrondPalmArecaceaePaleontologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Palm leaf fossils are common from Late Cretaceous floras in the United States, but Late Cretaceous Canadian palm records are limited largely to Nanaimo Group strata of British Columbia, with only anecdotal records from east of the Rocky Mountains. Here we report Late Cretaceous leaf fossils from Alberta and Saskatchewan, Canada. Segment angles with the rachis or costa are investigated as an additional character to distinguish costapalmate from pinnate and entire-pinnate palm leaves. The leaf fossils from Alberta and Saskatchewan represent costapalmate-palms (Sabalites), in contrast to the relatively common entire-pinnate palm fossils known from the Coniacian–early Campanian lower Nanaimo Group of British Columbia (e.g., Geonomites imperialis; potentially the oldest known North American palm) and the Campanian Two Medicine Formation of Montana (cf. Phoenicites). The presence of fossil palms in the Campanian to Maastrichtian of Alberta and Saskatchewan constrains climate reconstructions for the Late Cretaceous high mid-latitudes of North America (c. 55° N) to exclude significant freezing episodes. Additionally, we update the nomenclature for G. imperialis, renaming it as a species of Phoenicites, and briefly consider its value to understanding the evolution of pinnate palms. Further, we challenge the interpretation of Sabalites magothiensis as a costapalmate species and reassess the age of S. carolinensis as late Campanian.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.517
Threshold uncertainty score0.821

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Palaeobotany and PalynologySame topicPlant Diversity and EvolutionFrench-language works237,207