DDGANSE: Dual-Discriminator GAN with a Squeeze-and-Excitation Module for Infrared and Visible Image Fusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Infrared images can provide clear contrast information to distinguish between the target and the background under any lighting conditions. In contrast, visible images can provide rich texture details and are compatible with the human visual system. The fusion of a visible image and infrared image will thus contain both comprehensive contrast information and texture details. In this study, a novel approach for the fusion of infrared and visible images is proposed based on a dual-discriminator generative adversarial network with a squeeze-and-excitation module (DDGANSE). Our approach establishes confrontation training between one generator and two discriminators. The goal of the generator is to generate images that are similar to the source images, and contain the information from both infrared and visible source images. The purpose of the two discriminators is to increase the similarity between the image generated by the generator and the infrared and visible images. We experimentally demonstrated that using continuous adversarial training, DDGANSE outputs images retain the advantages of both infrared and visible images with significant contrast information and rich texture details. Finally, we compared the performance of our proposed method with previously reported techniques for fusing infrared and visible images using both quantitative and qualitative assessments. Our experiments on the TNO dataset demonstrate that our proposed method shows superior performance compared to other similar reported methods in the literature using various performance metrics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".