Deletion of <i>proU</i> suppresses <i>proQ</i> phenotypes in <i>Escherichia coli</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The ProQ protein interacts as an RNA chaperone with diverse RNA molecules in Escherichia coli . ProQ is implicated in the bacterial osmotic stress response. When the osmotic pressure is high, cells maintain their hydration by accumulating organic solutes denoted osmolytes. Transporters ProP and ProU (which is ProVWX) mediate osmolyte accumulation by Escherichia coli . Mutations at proQ impair ProP activity by reducing ProP levels (the ProQ transport phenotype) but do not impair ProU activity or reduce the level of ProX. The proQ - bacteria are longer than proQ + bacteria during growth in either low or high salinity medium and they grow slowly at high salinity (the ProQ growth phenotype). In addition, spherical cells with crescent-shaped, nucleic acid-rich foci appear and cells lyse (the ProQ morphological phenotypes). In this work, the proQ transport phenotype was suppressed by deletions of proU , or by an insertion of IS 5 in proU , when proP was expressed from the chromosome or from the heterologous, plasmid-based P BAD promoter. A point mutation disrupting the Walker B motif of ProV inactivated ProU but did not suppress the transport phenotype. ProP activities and ProP levels varied in parallel, so proQ and proU act at the same level to regulate ProP expression. Deletion of the proU operon also suppressed the growth and morphological phenotypes. The proU locus may overlap the gene encoding a regulatory sRNA that acts with ProQ, contributing to cellular morphogenesis and osmotic stress tolerance, or the relationship between ProQ and proU may be indirect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".