Normothermic Ex Vivo Kidney Perfusion for Human Kidney Transplantation: First North American Results
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Normothermic ex vivo kidney perfusion (NEVKP) has shown promising results for preservation, assessment, and reconditioning of kidney allografts in preclinical studies. Here, we report the first North American safety and feasibility study of deceased donor kidneys grafts transplanted following preservation with NEVKP. METHODS: Outcomes of 13 human kidney grafts that received 1 to 3 h of NEVKP after being transported in an anoxic hypothermic machine perfusion device were compared with a matched control group of 26 grafts that were preserved with anoxic hypothermic machine perfusion alone. RESULTS: Grafts were perfused for a median of 171 min (range, 44-275 min). The delayed graft function rate in NEVKP versus control patients was 30.8% versus 46.2% ( P = 0.51). During the 1-y follow-up, no differences in postoperative graft function, measured by serum creatinine, necessity for dialysis, and urine production, were found between the study group and the control group. There were no differences in 1 y posttransplantation graft or patient survival between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of NEVKP for human deceased donor kidney transplantation. Further studies are warranted to explore how this technology can minimize cold ischemia, improve posttransplant graft function, and assess and repair expanded criteria kidney grafts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".