MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4214877741 · doi:10.1101/2022.03.02.482602

Structure-informed microbial population genetics elucidate selective pressures that shape protein evolution

2022· preprint· en· W4214877741 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Evan Kiefl, Özcan C. Esen, Samuel Miller, Kourtney L. Kroll, Amy D. Willis, Michael S. Rappé, Tao Pan, A. Murat Eren

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Ocean SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of ChicagoAlfred P. Sloan Foundation
KeywordsNonsynonymous substitutionBiologyNegative selectionEvolutionary biologyPopulationGenetic variationGeneticsNeutral theory of molecular evolutionSelection (genetic algorithm)Context (archaeology)Genetic diversityGeneBalancing selectionMetagenomicsComputational biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Comprehensive sampling of natural genetic diversity with metagenomics enables highly resolved insights into the interplay between ecology and evolution. However, intra-population genomic variation represents the outcome of both stochastic and selective forces, making it difficult to identify whether variants are maintained by adaptive, neutral, or purifying processes. This is partly due to the reliance on gene sequences to interpret variants, which disregards the physical properties of three-dimensional gene products that define the functional landscape on which selection acts. Here we describe an approach to analyze genetic variation in the context of predicted protein structures, and apply it to study a marine microbial population within the SAR11 subclade 1a.3.V, which dominates low-latitude surface oceans. Our analyses reveal a tight association between the patterns of nonsynonymous polymorphism, selective pressures, and structural properties of proteins such as per-site relative solvent accessibility and distance to ligands, which explain up to 59% of genetic variance in some genes. In glutamine synthetase, a central gene in nitrogen metabolism, we observe decreased occurrence of nonsynonymous variants from ligand binding sites as a function of nitrate concentrations in the environment, revealing genetic targets of distinct evolutionary pressures maintained by nutrient availability. Our data also reveals that rare codons are purified from ligand binding sites when genes are under high selection, demonstrating the utility of structure-aware analyses to study the variants that likely impact translational processes. Overall, our work yields insights into the governing principles of evolution that shape the genetic diversity landscape within a globally abundant population, and makes available a software framework for structure-aware investigations of microbial population genetics. Significance Increasing availability of metagenomes offers new opportunities to study evolution, but the equal treatment of all variants limits insights into drivers of sequence diversity. By capitalizing on recent advances in protein structure prediction capabilities, our study examines subtle evolutionary dynamics of a microbial population that dominates surface oceans through the lens of structural biology. We demonstrate the utility of structure-informed metrics to understand the distribution of nonsynonymous polymorphism, establish insights into the impact of changing nutrient availability on protein evolution, and show that even synonymous variants are scrutinized strictly to maximize translational efficiency when selection is high. Overall, our work illustrates new opportunities for discovery at the intersection between metagenomics and structural bioinformatics, and offers an interactive and scalable software platform to visualize and analyze genetic variants in the context of predicted protein structures and ligand-binding sites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies→French-language works237,207→