MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214887765 · doi:10.3389/fmars.2022.845507

Habitat and Macrozoobenthic Diversity in Marine Protected Areas of the Southern Romanian Black Sea Coast

2022· article· en· W4214887765 on OpenAlexafffund
Tatiana Begun, Adrian Teacă, Mihaela Mureșan, Pedro A. Quijón, Selma Menabit, Victor Surugiu

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Marine Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward Island
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaExecutive Agency for Small and Medium-sized EnterprisesEuropean CommissionMinisterul Cercetării, Inovării şi Digitalizării
KeywordsBenthic zoneMarine protected areaHabitatEcologyBiomass (ecology)EcosystemDiversity indexMarine ecosystemGeographyEnvironmental scienceFisherySpecies richnessBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exposure to a variety of anthropogenic stressors has prompted the creation of a growing number of marine protected areas (MPAs). Unfortunately, long-term changes in both the sources of stress and the extent or operation of the MPAs have also occurred, at a pace that is often faster than the research trying to understand the consequences of those changes. This study addresses this challenge by focusing on two MPAs located in the southern Romanian Black Sea, namely the Cape Tuzla and the Mangalia Sulfur springs. Using 95 seafloor samples collected over a 7-year period, we explored distinct benthic habitats and their associated communities in a depth gradient common to both MPAs. We described benthic communities, their density, biomass, and diversity and subsequently used them as indicators of the health of the seafloor. Specifically, we used the M-AMBI*( n ) index to assess the ecological status of the benthic habitats found in both MPAs. Our results identified seven distinct habitats across infralittoral and circalittoral areas and described species composition and diversity levels, reaching up to a grand total of 119 benthic taxa. These communities were often dominated by polychaetes and crustaceans in terms of density and by mollusks in terms of biomass. Several mollusks represent key ecosystem engineer species creating or modifying their local habitat conditions. Our results revealed that two thirds of the sampling stations could be characterized as having a good ecological status (GES), and were therefore dominated by species normally considered as either sensitive or indifferent to organic pollution. Meanwhile, the other third of the stations was labeled as non-GES, was dominated by opportunistic species and represent a concern for the coastline system. This study calls for further research to carefully describe the valuable coastal habitats under the frame of MPAs, and to assess the effects of specific pollutants and the response of organisms that seem most affected by these stressors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Marine ScienceSame topicMarine Biology and Ecology ResearchFrench-language works237,207