MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214914082 · doi:10.1139/er-2021-0115

Green islands in a sea of fire: the role of fire refugia in the forests of Alberta

2022· article· en· W4214914082 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Marcus Sommers, Mike Flannigan

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Reviews · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcologyHabitatMicroclimateFire regimeGeographyVegetation (pathology)Fire ecologyClimate changeDisturbance (geology)EcosystemBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alberta wildfires vary greatly in severity, resulting in a mosaic of burnt, partially burnt, and unburnt forest. These unburnt patches (refugia) within the fire perimeter are critical for the survival of organisms during the fire and the regeneration process. We examined the literature to identify how the fire regimes and landscape features found in Alberta affect the creation and persistence of refugia, the role of refugia for the flora and fauna of Alberta, how climate change is likely to affect refugia, how humans may alter the creation and effectiveness of refugia, and management implications moving forward. Refugia can vary in scale from small areas of unburnt soil or boulders (centimetres to a few metres), to large stands of unburnt trees (many hectares) with different taxa using these refugia across all the spatial scales. Species reliant on habitat connectivity or old growth forest also benefit from refugia as they can use them as stepping-stones between intact habitats or as a lifeboat to recolonize from. The factors influencing what areas remain unburnt are complex and poorly understood but are likely tied to topography, aspect, proximity to waterbodies, weather changes (precipitation and wind direction), time of day during burning, and vegetation type. Areas with the right combination of topography, aspect, and proximity to water have cooler microclimates and higher moisture than the surrounding areas and may remain unburnt throughout multiple fire events, making them persistent refugia. Other areas may remain unburnt by a chance result of weather changes or having the fire pass through at night, making them random refugia. Many of the features that make persistent refugia unlikely to burn (cooler microclimate and higher moisture) will also buffer the effects of climate change. As a result, it is essential we manage the landscape in such a way as to protect areas that act as persistent refugia from industrial activities. In addition, we must restore fire in the landscape to maintain the mosaic of forest caused by mixed-severity fire, especially in the face of climate change, which is projected to increase the severity and frequency of wildfires in Alberta.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.178
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental ReviewsSame topicFire effects on ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207